2015
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1074290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying distributed cognition of simulation-based team training with DiCoT

Abstract: Funding This work was supported by the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB) and The SwedishGovernmental Agency for Innovation Systems (VINNOVA). AcknowledgementsThe authors thank the ETS instructors and simulation participants for enabling and contributing to this study. We also thank the reviewers for clear and constructive criticism that clarified the paper. Lastly, we thank our department colleagues Mattias Kristiansson, Erik Prytz, and Robin Keskisärkkä at Linköping University for our discussions on DC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicate that it is beneficial to apply a structured, pedagogical competencebased design to integrate the development of simulation training tools with workrelated performances. The benefits have been indicated also by other studies (Hämäläinen, Niilo-Rämä, et al, 2018;Rybing et al, 2016). Previous studies on competence-based guidance for simulation training (Brennan et al, 2014;Kopainsky et al, 2015) are consistent with the findings of this study.…”
Section: Conclusion and Implications For Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results indicate that it is beneficial to apply a structured, pedagogical competencebased design to integrate the development of simulation training tools with workrelated performances. The benefits have been indicated also by other studies (Hämäläinen, Niilo-Rämä, et al, 2018;Rybing et al, 2016). Previous studies on competence-based guidance for simulation training (Brennan et al, 2014;Kopainsky et al, 2015) are consistent with the findings of this study.…”
Section: Conclusion and Implications For Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To create realistic spatial and temporal feedback to the participants, a computer-based simulation tool (Forsgren et al 2011 ) was used to keep track of all units and resources, such as ambulances, helicopters and the movement of patients. Simulation of the treatment and condition of individual patients was carried out using an evidence-based analogue simulation system (Rybing et al 2016 ). The exercise used an indirect simulation approach for the RMCCT, which meant that they had no direct interaction with either simulation tool.…”
Section: Results: Capability Development Programme and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The label associated with a score of 5 in TAM is "somewhat useful", and 6 is "quite useful". Most participants in the evaluation perceived the digital system to function as the analogue system and participants were further observed to engage in a similar level of immersion as had been previously observed in ETS (Rybing et al, 2016). Several participants stated that using DIGEMERGO would increase control over several aspects of an exercise.…”
Section: Perceived Usefulnessmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…A DiCoT-analysis is also intended to be useful for (re)design of cognitive artefacts and systems, as it can highlight areas where the design of these could be improved (Furniss & Blandford, 2006). The result of our DiCoT analysis in the previous study (Rybing et al, 2016) was a description of cognitive functions, tasks, artefacts, and work processes of ETS expressed in the vocabulary of distributed cognition. …”
Section: Design Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation