Studying Human Resource Strategy: An Approach and an Agenda

Abstract

Summary Clearly, HRS research is in its infancy. We have only begun to make progress toward a better understanding of OHRS content, while FHRS content remains uncharted. Some research has been done in organizations with formal strategic human resource planning processes (e.g., Rush, 1983; Dyer, 1984), but much remains to be done here, as well. And the more informal approaches to organizational and functional strategic decision making represent virgin territories. All of these areas cannot be tackled in a single stream of research, but because strategy research is difficult, time consuming, and expensive, it is probably wise to combine areas and issues where possible. For example, a set of studies might be designed to describe and develop measures of both the content of OHRS and the process by which the content was formulated. Or, as we have done, research can focus on description and measurement, on the one hand, and on the other, either determinants or effects. Narrowly defined studies should be avoided at this stage, as should ill‐defined ones. Hence, the need for theory building (Schendel and Hofer, 1979). The immediate tasks are to explore the designated territories, develop meaningful concepts and constructs, and to generate working propositions, later to be followed by hypotheses (Duncan, 1979). It is descriptive theory that is needed now; formulating prescriptive theory aimed at strategic decision makers must await hypothesis development and testing. Descriptive theory demands descriptive research. For the most part, this means intensive case studies employing either longitudinal or retrospective designs that can capture the dynamic nature of strategy and strategy‐making processes. It may also mean action research to gain access to sensitive issues and intricate relationships (Bower, 1982). Surveys have a place, too; they may, however, be better viewed as supplemental to more intensive research than (as is more typical) the other way around. Large sample sizes (except in some of the survey work) are unlikely. Thus, sample organizations should be selected on the basis of their characteristics (variables of interest) and not randomly (Harrigan, 1983). For example, researchers should seek out organizations known to be experiencing change in OSs and those known to have similar OSs but quite different internal and external environments. To assess effects, organizations representing a broad range of performance outcomes (e.g., managing human resources, meeting OS goals, and making money) will have to be located. Inevitably, the relevance vs. rigor conundrum will arise. To the extent that prescriptive theory is the final goal, relevance must receive the nod. This means an emphasis on external rather than internal validity and on theory and research that focuses on those outcomes that practitioners want to influence and on variables that they can either measure (and thus adapt to) or manipulate and control (Thomas and Tyson, 1982). This amounts to a charge to do relevant research which is as much as possible rigor...

Human resource strategies and firm performance: what do we know and where do we need to go?

“…In research pertaining to human resource strategy, there are several types of outcomes which might apply (Dyer, 1984). The three most defensible are: (1) human resource outcomes such as absenteeism, turnover, and individual or group performance; (2) organizational outcomes such as productivity, quality, and service; and (3) financial or accounting outcomes such as return on invested capital or return on assets.…”

Causes and consequences of collective turnover: A meta-analytic review.

“…The magnitude of turnover-consequence relationships should also depend on the causal proximity of the focal outcome to the turnover construct itself. Dyer (1984) and Dyer and Reeves (1995) predicted an increasing likelihood of contamination of outcome measures as one moves from operational and organizational outcomes toward financial/bottom-line outcomes. Thus, the magnitude of turnover-outcome relationships should decrease as more distal (financial and/or market-based) outcomes considered as factors unrelated to the turnover construct (e.g., cyclical changes in sales, variations in input prices) begin to contribute to observed variance of the measures in question.…”

Testing the Dimensionality of Integrated Human Resource Management Strategy Among Manufacturing Organizations

“…Arthur, 1992Arthur, , 1994Miles and Snow, 1984;Wright and Snell, 1991) and numerous attempts have been made to define and operationalize its concept, in addition to identifying its determinants (Dyer, 1984;Tichy et al, 1982;Dyer and Reeves, 1995) and predicting the outcomes of effective strategy formulation processes (Buller, 1988). However, the concept of HRM strategy is relatively new in Asia country particularly in Malaysia.…”