2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-019-01038-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying mathematical practices: the dilemma of case studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The axioms of ZFC include: (1) the standard first order logical axioms; (2) two axioms for equality: x = y → (x ∈ z → y ∈ z) and x = y → (z ∈ x → z ∈ y); (3) the domain-specific axioms [8].…”
Section: Situating the Continuum Hypothesis Within Zermelo-fraenkel S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The axioms of ZFC include: (1) the standard first order logical axioms; (2) two axioms for equality: x = y → (x ∈ z → y ∈ z) and x = y → (z ∈ x → z ∈ y); (3) the domain-specific axioms [8].…”
Section: Situating the Continuum Hypothesis Within Zermelo-fraenkel S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the first side of Distinction 1 (solving philosophical issues) is not compatible with the second side of Distinction 2 (finding the entity of analysis in the empirical investigation), and we obtain the following three types of empirically informed philosophy: 1) Apostate speculator: Addressing philosophical questions via empirical information framed by pre-established epistemologies and ontologies/discursive entities 2) Informed analyst: Describing, studying or analytically investigating practices via a philosophical epistemic lens that includes pre-established ontologies/ discursive entities 3) Freeway explorer: Describing, studying or analytically investigating practices mainly drawing from epistemologies and ontologies/discursive entities established in the empirical research Since any analysis depends on previous theoretical baggage however minimal it is (see f.i. Chang et al 2011;Pitt and Pitt 2011;Rittberg and van Kerkhove 2019), the freeway explorer will feature onto-epistemic frames as well. But there is a difference of degree between the informed analyst and the freeway explorer: the latter works with minimal notions and is easily willing to accept the notions and objects of the practitioners that become apparent or emerge in the empirical analysis, while the former usually works with more philosophically sophisticated notions and ontologies, which they tend to cherish and therefore favour over alternatives.…”
Section: Uses Of Empirical Information: a New Categorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 This list has been compiled in joint work with Henrik Kragh Sørensen. It was originally published in Rittberg & Van Kerkhove (2019). little discussion about methods, especially in print.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For answers to this dilemma seeBurian (2001;, Schickore (2011), Chang (2011),Scholl & Räz (2016),Rittberg & Van Kerkhove (2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%