The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcomes Assessment 2014
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610621-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying Outcomes in Adolescents: The Millon Adolescent Clinical Inventory (MACI) and Millon Adolescent Personality Inventory (MAPI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of these derived scales were comprised of items evaluated by at least three authors with experience studying IPTS constructs as well as several hundred hours of clinical experience with juvenile offenders, increasing the likelihood the resulting scales were both representative of IPTS content and were developmentally appropriate. Further, because all of the items on our proxy measures were drawn from the MACI (Meagher & Grossman, ; Millon & Davis, ), this allays concerns about their readability and content coverage for adolescents. Finally, our proxy scales all demonstrated adequate internal consistency and significant zero‐order correlations in the expected direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these derived scales were comprised of items evaluated by at least three authors with experience studying IPTS constructs as well as several hundred hours of clinical experience with juvenile offenders, increasing the likelihood the resulting scales were both representative of IPTS content and were developmentally appropriate. Further, because all of the items on our proxy measures were drawn from the MACI (Meagher & Grossman, ; Millon & Davis, ), this allays concerns about their readability and content coverage for adolescents. Finally, our proxy scales all demonstrated adequate internal consistency and significant zero‐order correlations in the expected direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%