2016
DOI: 10.1017/s1431927616012095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying Polymer Self-Assembly by Combined Cryogenic and Liquid Phase Transmission Electron Microscopy

Abstract: The functionality of many materials depends on their hierarchical organization. Although in biology such materials can be formed through the self-organization of preformed building blocks, the bottom-up assembly of synthetic materials with predefined structures and properties is still out of reach. Our long term vision is to enable synthesis of hierarchical materials through multiscale assembly by combining the macromolecular self-assembly of predefined building blocks with their subsequent organization into m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cryogenic conditions preserve the hydrated state of the sample even under the electron microscope vacuum. As shown in Figure A, the nanostructure at pH 4.5 is clearly hollow nanotubes as indicated by the image contrast changing from tube edge to center. From the average of measurements of the cryo-TEM images (histogram shown in Figure S6), the tube diameter was determined to be 13.3 ± 0.7 nm (measured from wall center to wall center across the tube diameter), and the wall thickness was 3.1 ± 0.5 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cryogenic conditions preserve the hydrated state of the sample even under the electron microscope vacuum. As shown in Figure A, the nanostructure at pH 4.5 is clearly hollow nanotubes as indicated by the image contrast changing from tube edge to center. From the average of measurements of the cryo-TEM images (histogram shown in Figure S6), the tube diameter was determined to be 13.3 ± 0.7 nm (measured from wall center to wall center across the tube diameter), and the wall thickness was 3.1 ± 0.5 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%