“…To understand whether a preservice English language teacher education program (ELTEP) provides environmental education to preservice EL teachers, it can be evaluated with an anthropocentric perspective. Yet, the review of the studies on the evaluation of preservice ELTEPs has shown that several studies evaluated preservice ELTEPs according to EL teacher trainers (Yavuz & Zehir Topkaya, 2013), student EL teachers (Dubetz & Collett, 2020;Karim, Shaded, Mohamed, Rahman, & Ismail, 2019;Kourieos & Diakou, 2019;Uzun, 2016;Varol, 2018), or both (Coskun & Daloglu, 2010;Kartal & Başol, 2019;Rodríguez, 2016;Sulistiyo, Wiryotinoyo, & Wulan, 2019;Zorba, 2015) in terms of their strengths and weaknesses (Coskun & Daloglu, 2010;Sulistiyo et al, 2019;Yavuz & Zehir Topkaya, 2013;Zorba, 2015) as well as their effectiveness in preparing preservice teachers to teach English (Dubetz & Collett, 2020;Karim et al, 2019;Kartal & Başol, 2019;Kourieos & Diakou, 2019;Uzun, 2016;Varol, 2018). In addition, preservice ELTEPs of different countries were compared (Karakaş & Yavuz, 2018), different preservice ELTEPs of Turkey were compared (Karakas, 2012;Öztürk & Aydın, 2019;Solak, 2018), and the theoretical foundations (Ryan, Gladyo, Hobbs, Stargel, & Williams, 2015) and effective pedagogical practices (Rodríguez, 2016) in a preservice ELTEP were expressed in other studies on the evaluation of preservice ELTEPs.…”