2019
DOI: 10.1080/01626620.2019.1650400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying Program Effectiveness in Preparing Teachers for English Learners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Teaching-Works, 2021) has also made connections between implementing organizational routines and social justice within students' participation in the general curriculum. CP scholarship focused specifically on MSs has referenced culturally responsive curriculum & pedagogy (Dubetz, 2014) and facilitating productive student talk (Stoddart et al, 2017). However, there is much to be done to systematically examine how CPs may support NTs in enacting classroom management practices that either bolster or counteract humanizing the education of MSs.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Core Practices For Humanizing Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teaching-Works, 2021) has also made connections between implementing organizational routines and social justice within students' participation in the general curriculum. CP scholarship focused specifically on MSs has referenced culturally responsive curriculum & pedagogy (Dubetz, 2014) and facilitating productive student talk (Stoddart et al, 2017). However, there is much to be done to systematically examine how CPs may support NTs in enacting classroom management practices that either bolster or counteract humanizing the education of MSs.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Core Practices For Humanizing Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand whether a preservice English language teacher education program (ELTEP) provides environmental education to preservice EL teachers, it can be evaluated with an anthropocentric perspective. Yet, the review of the studies on the evaluation of preservice ELTEPs has shown that several studies evaluated preservice ELTEPs according to EL teacher trainers (Yavuz & Zehir Topkaya, 2013), student EL teachers (Dubetz & Collett, 2020;Karim, Shaded, Mohamed, Rahman, & Ismail, 2019;Kourieos & Diakou, 2019;Uzun, 2016;Varol, 2018), or both (Coskun & Daloglu, 2010;Kartal & Başol, 2019;Rodríguez, 2016;Sulistiyo, Wiryotinoyo, & Wulan, 2019;Zorba, 2015) in terms of their strengths and weaknesses (Coskun & Daloglu, 2010;Sulistiyo et al, 2019;Yavuz & Zehir Topkaya, 2013;Zorba, 2015) as well as their effectiveness in preparing preservice teachers to teach English (Dubetz & Collett, 2020;Karim et al, 2019;Kartal & Başol, 2019;Kourieos & Diakou, 2019;Uzun, 2016;Varol, 2018). In addition, preservice ELTEPs of different countries were compared (Karakaş & Yavuz, 2018), different preservice ELTEPs of Turkey were compared (Karakas, 2012;Öztürk & Aydın, 2019;Solak, 2018), and the theoretical foundations (Ryan, Gladyo, Hobbs, Stargel, & Williams, 2015) and effective pedagogical practices (Rodríguez, 2016) in a preservice ELTEP were expressed in other studies on the evaluation of preservice ELTEPs.…”
Section: If It Doesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon graduating with a BA from a public university, Sylvia stayed at the institution and enrolled in a graduate program where both authors are instructors. Sylvia participated in a study of program graduates in their first two years of teaching (Dubetz & Collett, 2020). During her fourth year, we asked Sylvia if we could observe how her pedagogical approaches continued to develop.…”
Section: Teachermentioning
confidence: 99%