2014
DOI: 10.1037/a0037662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying sexual aggression: A review of the evolution and validity of laboratory paradigms.

Abstract: Objective Researchers have endeavored for decades to develop and implement experimental assessments of sexual aggression and its precursors to capitalize on the many scientific advantages offered by laboratory experiments, such as rigorous control of key variables and identification of causal relationships. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of and commentary on the evolution of these laboratory-based methods. Conclusions To date, two primary types of sexual aggression laboratory studies ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(103 reference statements)
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, both men and women victims of sexual violence show the same negative psychological outcomes, making all forms of sexual violence worthy of further study. Laboratory sexual aggression paradigms developed for women would be informative (see Davis et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, both men and women victims of sexual violence show the same negative psychological outcomes, making all forms of sexual violence worthy of further study. Laboratory sexual aggression paradigms developed for women would be informative (see Davis et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the data to date are descriptive and correlational, experimental research with laboratory sexual aggression paradigms is needed to identify causal influences and moderators. Such paradigms exist but to our knowledge have not yet been used with women (for a review, see Davis et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Part 1: Aggressive Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated, our composite effect size and null tests of moderation are likely an oversimplification of the complexity of the alcohol-aggression relationship predicated by an insufficient body of research. Despite the complexity of alcohol administration studies, including resistance from regulating bodies and practical complications associated with alcohol administration and participant compensation, carefully controlled experimental methods remain the gold standard for establishing a causal relationship between alcohol intoxication and adverse behavioral outcomes that cannot be determined through cross-sectional or event-level methods alone (Davis et al, 2014). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, those in clinical practice are encouraged to use interview techniques in addition to multiple, standardized questionnaires to identify cases. For those engaging in prevention work, the use of behavioral and analog assessments such as virtual reality paradigms and vignette assessments (Davis, Parrott, et al, 2014;Jouriles, Simpson Rowe, McDonald, Platt, & Gomez, 2011) is recommended as helpful supplements to standardized questionnaires to assess risk related to sexual victimization and sexual perpetration. Policies which support basic, as well as applied science, are important to answer the types of methodological questions explored here.…”
Section: Clinical and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%