2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10569-017-9779-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying the errors in the estimation of the variation of energy by the “patched-conics” model in the three-dimensional swing-by

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A detailed Fig. 9 Energy variations using the numerical method (a) and the absolute error between the methods (b), for e = 0.3 study of this point is recently made for the circular case (Negri et al 2017). A similar analysis is not in the scope of the present paper, but should be done to clarify this point.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Results Obtained By The Analytical Anmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A detailed Fig. 9 Energy variations using the numerical method (a) and the absolute error between the methods (b), for e = 0.3 study of this point is recently made for the circular case (Negri et al 2017). A similar analysis is not in the scope of the present paper, but should be done to clarify this point.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Results Obtained By The Analytical Anmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This behavior is expected, since the same parameters of the Earth-Moon system were used, except for the eccentricity, in the present paper. A larger gravitational parameter for the system decreases the accuracy of the analytical model, as detailed in Negri et al (2017). The results also show in details that the eccentricity of the primaries makes the velocity of the secondary body around the primary ( V 2 ) to have values which are dependent on the position of M 2 in its orbit.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Results Obtained By The Analytical Anmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earth-Moon system), a three-body problem is needed. Further considerations about the limitation of the patched-conics can be found in the literature [10,36,67,68,76,81,90,91].…”
Section: What Is a Gravity-assist?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under this assumption, each body has its own sphere of influence (Bate et al 1971;Araujo et al 2008). A detailed study of the errors introduced by this assumption is shown in Negri et al (2017). When the spacecraft is within the sphere of influence of one of the bodies, only the gravitational force between the spacecraft and this body is considered, while the gravity field of the other body is neglected.…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%