2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(00)01509-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stutter-free and stutter-filled speech signals and their role in stuttering amelioration for English speaking adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stuttering can be substantially reduced (i.e., ∼55%-70%) when reading while listening to speech that is not linguistically matched to the speech being produced. Exogenous speech signals that have proven effective for this purpose include fluent speech and stuttered speech, continuous vowels, and dynamic vowel trains (Kalinowski, Dayalu, Stuart, Rastatter, & Rami, 2000), intermittent vowels , reversed stuttered speech (Kalinowski, Saltuklaroglu, Guntupalli, & Stuart, 2004), temporally expanded speech (Guntupalli, Kalinowski, Saltuklaroglu, & Nanjundeswaran, 2005), and even sine wave analogs of speech (Saltuklaroglu & Kalinowski, 2006). Furthermore, simply viewing another person silently mouth the same material also inhibits stuttering by ∼70% (Kalinowski, Stuart, Rastatter, Snyder, & Dayalu, 2000), demonstrating that this phenomenon is not limited to the acoustic domain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stuttering can be substantially reduced (i.e., ∼55%-70%) when reading while listening to speech that is not linguistically matched to the speech being produced. Exogenous speech signals that have proven effective for this purpose include fluent speech and stuttered speech, continuous vowels, and dynamic vowel trains (Kalinowski, Dayalu, Stuart, Rastatter, & Rami, 2000), intermittent vowels , reversed stuttered speech (Kalinowski, Saltuklaroglu, Guntupalli, & Stuart, 2004), temporally expanded speech (Guntupalli, Kalinowski, Saltuklaroglu, & Nanjundeswaran, 2005), and even sine wave analogs of speech (Saltuklaroglu & Kalinowski, 2006). Furthermore, simply viewing another person silently mouth the same material also inhibits stuttering by ∼70% (Kalinowski, Stuart, Rastatter, Snyder, & Dayalu, 2000), demonstrating that this phenomenon is not limited to the acoustic domain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been recently hypothesized that people who stutter exhibit overt stuttering moments in an attempt to overcome an involuntary block [35] . These overt behaviors are considered as symptoms of the underlying pathology and possess some ameliorative capacity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, he suggests that no additional training is required to reduce the internal manifestations of the disorder. However, the origin of stuttering is thought to be a central involuntary block, though its true origin and physiological nature remains unknown (Kalinowski et al 2000). Numerous neuroimaging studies have found stuttering to be associated with increased activity in motor regions such as the supplementary motor area and superior lateral premotor cortex with right lateralization (Fox et al 1996), left anterior cingulate and inferior prefrontal cortex (De Nil et al 2000), right frontal operculum , fronto-motor areas, parietal, temporal, limbic and insular areas of the right hemisphere .…”
Section: Stuttering Is An Experiential Disorder With Multiple Levels mentioning
confidence: 99%