Styles of Life, the “Labour Aristocracy” and Class Relations in Later Nineteenth Century Edinburgh

Abstract

The idea of a "labour aristocracy" pervades writing about the British working class of the second half, and especially the third quarter of the nineteenth century.1 This emphasis is, in my view, correct: the behaviour and consciousness of working people cannot be explained without some such concept of divisions within the working class. But this proposition has too often been allowed to conclude, rather than to commence the enquiry. The fragmentation of the manual working class into different strata and sub-cultures may take several forms, and is bound to have local and industrial variations. In approaching the problem it is necessary to draw a clear distinction between differences in the class situation of various groups of workers, and the formation of separate working class strata -a cultural and political process. Three main levels of analysis are relevant to this problem: the stratification within the working class, in terms of class situations (relative earnings, security, prospects and opportunities, position of subordination or autonomy in the workplace, and so on); the extent to which various strata of manual workers were distinguished by the cultivation of particular styles of life, and by commitment to particular sets of norms and values; and the consequences of these for institutions embodying the interest of manual workers as a class (unions, parties, etc.) and for the patterning of conflict and consensus in the society. The present paper is concerned with the second level of analysis: that is, with the extent to which we can detect the articulation of a cultural identity, a more or less self-conscious exclusiveness, by an

Residential Segregation and Class Formation in the Capitalist City: A Review and Directions for Research

“…2 For the most part their contri butions take the form of asides to more general arguments. For Engels, segregation in Manchester in 1844 was only one of the more visible aspects of the emergence of a new class system (Engels, 1969); for Gray, segregation is seen as an element in the formation of a labour aristocracy in late nineteenth-century Edinburgh (Gray, 1973); for Stedman Jones it was part of a significant 'remaking' of the British working class as a whole (Stedman Jones, 1971;1973/74); Smith suggests that neighbourhoods played a part in worker solidarity and class formation in nineteenth-century Sheffield (Smith, 1982). Across the Atlantic, Walker has interpreted the importance of residential differentiation within the specific context of suburbanization in late nineteenth-century US cities (Walker, 1981).…”

The Body, Sport and Power Relations

“…The strategy exerted a significant effect on class relations, not because it succeeded in disciplining the majority of the -working class -which it conspicuously failed to do -but because it helped to involve a key section of the class in a pattern of 'rational recreation' which detached it from the remainder of the class during its leisure time (Gray, 1976). This section comprised male manual workers in relatively stable economic circumstances, who were inclined to self-improvement, and were more organized in their daily lives.…”

Psychiatry’s ‘Others’? Rethinking the Professional Self-Fashioning of British Mental Nursesc. 1900–20

“…77 This does not simply indicate their embourgeoisement; rather, it encouraged a militant self-respect, which in turn underpinned political and status claims. 78 Consciously 'skilled' workers were more likely to be radicalised than their semi-skilled peers, and so to combine in defence of their economic interests. 79 For all his stated moderation, Allway displayed a tough edge when discussing the value of nurses' labour.…”