Styles of Service Composition -- Analysis and Comparison Methods

Halili, Festim; Rufati, Eip; Ninka, Ilia

doi:10.1109/cicsyn.2013.66

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Different composition mechanisms can coexist in the same system. For example, it is possible to build a system where some services are composed using orchestration while others are composed by choreography [155,252]. Our intention is not to analyse the combination of different composition mechanisms, but to analyse them individually.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating IoT service composition mechanisms for the scalability of IoT systems

Arellanes

Lau

2020

Future Generation Computer Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Internet of Things (IoT) is an emerging paradigm where practically every (physical and virtual) thing will be interconnected through innovative distributed services. Since the number of connected things is rapidly growing, IoT systems will require the composition of plenty of services into complex workflows. Thus, scalability in terms of the size of IoT systems becomes a significant concern. In this paper, we review and evaluate the fundamental semantics of existing IoT service composition mechanisms to determine how well they fulfil the scalability requirements of IoT systems. We identify scalability desiderata and, accordingly, our findings show that dataflows, orchestration and choreography do not fully satisfy such desiderata, unlike a novel composition mechanism called DX-MAN.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating IoT service composition mechanisms for the scalability of IoT systems

Arellanes

Lau

2020

Future Generation Computer Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…By combining one-way exchanges with features provided by the underlying transport protocol and/or application specific information, SOAP can be used to create more complex interactions such as request/response, request/multiple response, etc. (Mumbaikar & Padiya, 2013;Halili, Rufati & Ninka, 2013) The process of invoking web services is very important; therefore the SOAP protocol is established to exchange messages between service providers and consumers. It is a structured XML message format for exchanging data in a distributed environment.…”

Section: Soapmentioning

confidence: 99%

Web Services: A Comparison of Soap and Rest Services

Halili¹,

Ramadani²

2018

MAS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The interest on Web services has been growing rapidly in these couple of years since their start of use. A web service would be described as a method for exchanging/communicating information between devices over a network. Often, when deciding which service would fit on the architecture design to develop a product, then the question rises which service to use and when?SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) and REST (Representational State Transfer) are the two most used protocols to exchange messages, so choosing one over the other has its own advantages and disadvantages. In this paper we have addressed the differences and best practices when to use one over the other.

show abstract

“…In this composition model, no service has a privileged role once each service needs to describe its parts during the interaction process. An e-contract is considered an agreement between a set of parties that describes how the collaboration should occur (Halili et al, 2013). Proposed architectures provide tools that allow the development of software to support service arrangements in complex business rules (Huang et al, 2009) (Karunamurthy et al, 2012.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

e-Business Architecture for Web Service Composition based on e-Contract Lifecycle

Neto¹,

Hirata²

2015

Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays, most of the approaches for compositions of web services are focused on feasibility of implementation rather than on satisfying business concerns. Meeting business concerns also demands flexible and agile implementations. We present an approach for service composition based on the lifecycle of e-contract. Econtracts have clauses and rules that express business concerns on how services are offered and consumed. We propose an architecture that enables the automation of implementation of composite services. The automation is on the configuration of web service engines. The architectural model supports the publication of contracts that describe how services are offered from different providers in order to develop the composition of services.

show abstract

Styles of Service Composition -- Analysis and Comparison Methods

Cited by 5 publications

References 4 publications

Evaluating IoT service composition mechanisms for the scalability of IoT systems

Evaluating IoT service composition mechanisms for the scalability of IoT systems

Web Services: A Comparison of Soap and Rest Services

e-Business Architecture for Web Service Composition based on e-Contract Lifecycle

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About