2010
DOI: 10.1118/1.3468131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SU-GG-I-98: Using MTF to Assess the Influence of X-Ray Focal Spot Blur on the Resolution of Fluoroscopic Imaging Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that, for focal spot size ∼1 mm, increased focal spot penumbral blur associated with increasing SID can adversely affect image quality (Rossmann 1970, Doi 1974, Fetterly et al 2010, Dance 2014, Dehairs et al 2020. This penumbral blur effect was not addressed herein but must be considered for practical application of these results to cine angiography imaging of adult patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is well known that, for focal spot size ∼1 mm, increased focal spot penumbral blur associated with increasing SID can adversely affect image quality (Rossmann 1970, Doi 1974, Fetterly et al 2010, Dance 2014, Dehairs et al 2020. This penumbral blur effect was not addressed herein but must be considered for practical application of these results to cine angiography imaging of adult patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is recognized that variable geometric magnification realized by changing SID affects x-ray system blur and spatial resolution (Fetterly et al 2010a, 2010b, Dehairs et al 2020. In this context, it may be anticipated that use of the large versus small focal spot and SID 120 cm versus 105 cm may result in penumbral blur which degrades image quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work demonstrated that the median effective water equivalent thickness of adult patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures was 28 cm (5th to 95th percentile 21-36 cm, max. 42 cm) (Fetterly et al 2010a(Fetterly et al , 2010b. Therefore, Plastic Water ® LR 15 keV-8 MeV (CIRS, Norfolk, VA) phantoms with area 30× 30 cm 2 and thickness in the range 20-44 cm (4 cm increments) were used to attenuate the primary beam and create scatter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%