2010
DOI: 10.1118/1.3468756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SU‐GG‐T‐359: The Applications of MatriXX to Electron Beam Dosimetry

Abstract: Purpose: The objective of this study is to investigate the properties of I'mRT Matrixx device in electron beams, and to develop methods of electron dosimetry using Matrixx. Method and Materials: The measurements were conducted using Matrixx in electron beams from Siemens linacs. The Matrixx was placed horizontally on the linac tabletop, supported with solid water blocks. Solid water layers were used for dose buildup on top of the Matrixx. For all the measurements, the linac gantry angle was 0°, and the SSD was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously measured, 33 we estimated the intrinsic effective water equivalent depth of MatriXX to be about 4.5 mm for the 9 MeV beam and about 3.5 mm for the 22 MeV beam. We plotted the ionization point measurements taken with the MatriXX (normalized to 100% at the maximum value) together with the depth ionization scans generated in the water tank.…”
Section: Iia Quality Assurancesupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As previously measured, 33 we estimated the intrinsic effective water equivalent depth of MatriXX to be about 4.5 mm for the 9 MeV beam and about 3.5 mm for the 22 MeV beam. We plotted the ionization point measurements taken with the MatriXX (normalized to 100% at the maximum value) together with the depth ionization scans generated in the water tank.…”
Section: Iia Quality Assurancesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…We are using an ion chamber array (I'mRT MatriXX, IBA Dosimetry AB, Uppsala, Sweden) in a coronal plane, at a depth corresponding to around 75% of the electron dose (usually 5 cm) in order to test the accuracy with which the photon IMRT portion of the treatment adds dose to the nonuniform electron dose distribution. Since the detector has to be calibrated separately for the electron beam measurement as previously suggested, 33 the photon IMRT and electron beam portion of the plan should be measured separately. The same phantom setup was used to enable the addition of the electron and photon dose contributions in software.…”
Section: Iia Quality Assurancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we report our investigation on the feasibility of using MatriXX in electron beam dosimetry and routine linac QA or patient-specific treatment QA. This note is the expansion of an abstract submitted to the 2010 American Association of Physicists in Medicine annual meeting [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%