2013
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(13)64048-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Su1666 Clinical Outcomes for Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Duodenum and Ampulla of Vater: A Population-Based Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
26
2
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
26
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean age (63.5 vs. 57 years), mean mitotic count (1/10 HPF), Ki67 (1%) and grade of the tumor (NET G1) were comparable with the study done by Ishido et al (9). The clinical course of the ampullary NETs are different from duodenal NETs, as they have a more aggressive phenotype, with generally higher-grade tumor (10).…”
Section: Similar To Our Study Maggard Et Al and Modlin Et Alsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The mean age (63.5 vs. 57 years), mean mitotic count (1/10 HPF), Ki67 (1%) and grade of the tumor (NET G1) were comparable with the study done by Ishido et al (9). The clinical course of the ampullary NETs are different from duodenal NETs, as they have a more aggressive phenotype, with generally higher-grade tumor (10).…”
Section: Similar To Our Study Maggard Et Al and Modlin Et Alsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Neither type of resection nor margin status was predictive of improved OS. Other investigators have also reported on the type of procedure used for resection and have not found an association with long‐term outcomes . These findings highlight that although there is a clear indication to achieve local control with resection of the primary tumor, survival may not be affected by extent of resection largely due to the indolent nature of this disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There was a concomitant decrease in the presentation of patients with stage IV disease, from almost 20% 24 using a similar cohort of 1,360 patients from the SEER registry, noted a similarly excellent median survival of 143 months. 23 In addition, we found an improved 5-year survival for patients presenting after 2006 (85.2 vs 89.6%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%