1986
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(86)90753-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub-Coulomb transfer in collisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dependence of the transfer probability on the distance of closest approach is expected to give some information on the excitation energy at which the nucleon transfer occurs. The experimental slope 2e= 1.07 _+0.01 fm -~ [10] was found to be very close to the calculated value 2 c~ = 1.03 fm -~ from the average neutron ground-state binding energies [18] thus indicating low excitation energies in the transfer products and therefore small fission probabilities after transfer, Coulomb excitation not yet taken into account. On the other hand, in the similar reaction i84W-q-z38u it was found, that most of the transfer fission observed occurs because of the simultaneous Coulomb excitation which takes place for these heavy ions [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The dependence of the transfer probability on the distance of closest approach is expected to give some information on the excitation energy at which the nucleon transfer occurs. The experimental slope 2e= 1.07 _+0.01 fm -~ [10] was found to be very close to the calculated value 2 c~ = 1.03 fm -~ from the average neutron ground-state binding energies [18] thus indicating low excitation energies in the transfer products and therefore small fission probabilities after transfer, Coulomb excitation not yet taken into account. On the other hand, in the similar reaction i84W-q-z38u it was found, that most of the transfer fission observed occurs because of the simultaneous Coulomb excitation which takes place for these heavy ions [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…1. The a39U counting was done for absolute normalization to avoid systematic errors in the comparison of the fission cross sections from this work with the separate measurements of one-neutron transfer in [10]. The fission cross sections are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations