MBR
IntroductionIn recent years, the membrane bioreactor (MBR) process, which is considered to be a good integration of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) system and the micro-filtration (MF) or ultrafiltration (UF) membrane separation processes (Williams and Pirbazari, 2007), has gained worldwide attraction and popularity due to its small footprint, low sludge production and good effluent quality (Wang et al., 2006). According to a technical market research report (Hanft, 2006), the global market for membrane bioreactor is rising at an average annual growth rate of 10.9%, and is expected to approach US$363 million in 2010 with the market for membrane modules up to US$157 million.However, there are three major drawbacks preventing the wide application of this process, including high cost of membrane modules, low membrane strength especially for hollow fibers and the potential rapid loss of performance due to membrane fouling (Fan and Huang, 2002; Zhou et al., 2008). The dynamic membrane bioreactor (DMBR) process, which usually uses mesh, no woven fabric, and filter-cloth as filter media, is one of the solutions to these problems. The dynamic membrane is also known as secondary membrane or formed-in-place membrane. When filtering a feed solution containing fine particles, a dynamic or secondary layer of rejected particles is formed on the underlying primary filter surface (Kuberkar and Davis, 2000). Once the membrane has become severely fouled, the dynamic layer can be replaced by a new deposited layer, that * Corresponding author. Tel./fax: þ86 10 62849108. E-mail address: yaobofan@hotmail.com (Y. Fan).A v a i l a b l e a t w w w . s c i e n c e d i r e c t . w a t e r r e s e a r c h 4 4 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 9 9 7 -1 0 0 5