2018
DOI: 10.1111/jicd.12325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub‐epithelial connective tissue graft for the management of Miller's class I and class II isolated gingival recession defect: A systematic review of the factors influencing the outcome

Abstract: The aim of the present systematic review was to analyze the factors that affect the outcome of subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) for managing Miller's class I and class II isolated gingival recession defect. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses) guidelines for systematic reviews were used. Quality assessments of selected articles were performed. Data on root surface condition, recession type defect, flap thickness, different flap designs, different harvestin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Risk factors such as nicotine consumption and irregular SPT are well known and proven (Chambrone et al, ; Rasperini et al, ; Yadav et al, ) but could not be used for further calculations in this study due to the low number of cases included (Table ). In the case of the present study, a more regular participation in SPT and, thus, a possibly better control of the underlying aetiological factors would probably have led to even better results (Tatakis et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk factors such as nicotine consumption and irregular SPT are well known and proven (Chambrone et al, ; Rasperini et al, ; Yadav et al, ) but could not be used for further calculations in this study due to the low number of cases included (Table ). In the case of the present study, a more regular participation in SPT and, thus, a possibly better control of the underlying aetiological factors would probably have led to even better results (Tatakis et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have evaluated individual aspects of the CTG procedure, such as root surface treatment, flap thickness, flap design, graft de‐epithelialization, and others . ‒ A recent systematic review assessed the effects of a broad array of such factors, concluding that CTG is a predictable procedure to achieve root coverage in Miller Class I and II recession defects and that several factors have a critical role in the outcome of root coverage. However, no study to date has directly compared grafts of different thickness and the potential impact on surgical outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also a limitation of the free connective graft in this case report. Subepithelial connective tissue grafts are considered one of the best methods for root coverage and also to increase the width and thickness of keratinized gums (Han et al, 2008;Henriques et al, 2010;Yadav et al, 2018) with good predictability due to the blood supply coming from both the periosteum and the flap that covers the graft, thus preventing its necrosis (Yadav et al, 2018). However, in the technique used in this clinical case, connective tissue was used as a technique for free gingival graft, anchored in the recipient bed, which is the only source of blood supply for the graft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is more likely to occur in patients with a thin tissue phenotype . (Yadav et al, 2018;Storrer et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%