2015
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/48/25/255302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub-Poissonian and anti-bunching criteria via majorization of statistics

Abstract: Abstract. We use majorization and confidence intervals as a convenient tool to compare the uncertainty in photon number for different quantum light states. To this end majorization is formulated in terms of confidence intervals. As a suitable case study we apply this tool to sub-and super-Posissonian behavior and bunching and antibunching effects. We focus on the most significant classical and nonclassical states, such as Glauber coherent, thermal, photon number, and squeezed states. We show that majorization … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, majorization arises naturally in several problems of quantum information theory. A nonexhaustive list includes entanglement criteria [2,3], characterizing mixing and quantum measurements [4][5][6], majorization uncertainty relations [7][8][9][10][11][12] and quantum entropies [13][14][15][16], among others [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] (see also [24,25] for reviews of some of these topics).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, majorization arises naturally in several problems of quantum information theory. A nonexhaustive list includes entanglement criteria [2,3], characterizing mixing and quantum measurements [4][5][6], majorization uncertainty relations [7][8][9][10][11][12] and quantum entropies [13][14][15][16], among others [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] (see also [24,25] for reviews of some of these topics).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%