2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub-transducer element spatial resolution ultrasound wavefront modification using passive twin-layer compensators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a perspective of potentially improving transcranial ultrasound imaging of the brain, the spatial resolution of the UPIC concept will depend upon the spatial resolutions of both the x-ray CT/MRI image data and that of the 3D-printer utilised. It has recently been demonstrated however that the UPIC concept has potential to provide superior ultrasound spatial resolution than provided by the current active approach, since the latter is primarily determined by the generally larger physical dimensions of the individual transducer elements [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From a perspective of potentially improving transcranial ultrasound imaging of the brain, the spatial resolution of the UPIC concept will depend upon the spatial resolutions of both the x-ray CT/MRI image data and that of the 3D-printer utilised. It has recently been demonstrated however that the UPIC concept has potential to provide superior ultrasound spatial resolution than provided by the current active approach, since the latter is primarily determined by the generally larger physical dimensions of the individual transducer elements [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variables that determine the relative thickness of the two UPIC layers, z u1 (i) and z u2 (i), are their corresponding ultrasound velocities, v u1 and v u2 , relative to the sample material velocity (v s ), as illustrated in figure 3. The thickness of the two UPIC layers is equal if the expressions described in equation (10) are equal, as illustrated in figure 3(a).…”
Section: Scenario 2: Upic Materials Velocity Cannot Match Single Mate...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant benefit of the ‘passive’ UPIC concept has recently been reported, demonstrating that ultrasound wavefront correction may be implemented for features that are smaller than the dimensions of the ultrasound transducer element(s), being the primary spatial resolution limiting factor for the current ‘active’ approach. 15 The passive UPIC concept offers a broad utility and the authors consider that it may be applied to single-element and linear-array ultrasound transducers of any frequency and dimension. Future work should determine UPIC’s performance associated with utility of a concave transducer and/or a curved sample surface such as the skull.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With such acoustic lenses, we were able to focus through a set of 3 human skulls, and show comparable levels of precision and efficiency to those attained by conventional, multi-element systems. Nevertheless, such an approach suffers from an inherent limitation: each lens is designed for one given patient and one given target [54], meaning thatfor a given patient -a surgeon could neither change the target after the fabrication of the lens, nor treat a large area over the course of the surgery, without making a new lens. Correcting aberrations with an acoustic lens thus seemed like a less flexible method than using multi-element arrays, with which new phase sets can be electronically changed to aim at another target during treatment procedure [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%