2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2006.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subaru Main Belt Asteroid Survey (SMBAS)—Size and color distributions of small main-belt asteroids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
60
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
12
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To set r 0 , we rely on data for asteroids in the solar system, which have radii ranging from 100-300 km to 0.5-1 km (e.g., Yoshida et al 2003;Yoshida & Nakamura 2007;Gladman et al 2009). To sample this range, we consider r 0 = 0.1-100 km.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To set r 0 , we rely on data for asteroids in the solar system, which have radii ranging from 100-300 km to 0.5-1 km (e.g., Yoshida et al 2003;Yoshida & Nakamura 2007;Gladman et al 2009). To sample this range, we consider r 0 = 0.1-100 km.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best two fields observed in good conditions in the ecliptic (2010 XC25 and 2009 CS, both far from opposition) give similar densities to each other and an average of 45 known MBAs and 90 unknown MBAs per square degree, thus a total of 135 Yoshida et al (2003) who counted 208 MBAs per square degree up to R ∼ 23.0 based on the opposition SMBAS-I survey and 182 MBAs per square degree to the same limit from the SMBAS-II survey (Yoshida and Nakamura, 2007). Based on our larger INT dataset, 41 known and 66 unknown MBAs per square degree could be detected in average in the observed fields.…”
Section: Unknown Mba Densitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Since the size distribution changes for different size ranges and for very small objects is not well known, it is not easy to choose values for their parameters in the smaller size end of the distribution. As a first guess we used the size distribution proposed by Yoshida & Nakamura (2007) for objects with a radius between 500 m and 200 or 100 m, in spite that these authors proposed it for objects larger than 250 m. It is possible that this size distribution could be still valid for smaller objects (for example, for r < ∼ 100 m) producing a shallow size distribution and a shortage of small projectiles, making the ACO collisional reactivation process very improbable. Nevertheless, this shallow size distribution extended to very small sizes is difficult to reconcile with the cratering records of (243) Ida, (253) Mathilde, and (951) Gaspra (Chapman 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size distribution of very small main belt asteroids is not well known, so it is not easy to choose values for the parameters r c , K 0 , b 0 , K 1 , and b 1 . We decide to use two size distributions with r c = 200 m and 100 m, respectively, and to assume the size distribution proposed by Yoshida & Nakamura (2007) in the size range r c < r < 500 m (b 0 = 2.29), and a Dohnanyi (1969) size distribution for objects smaller than r c (b 1 = 3.5). Using this combined size distribution the total number of objects with a radius larger than 0.5 m is 1.42 × 10 13 in the first case and 6.11 × 10 12 in the second.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%