2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-018-0337-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subassemblage tests and design of steel channels assembled buckling-restrained braces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…) of BRB can be calculated from the Equation 12 deduced from Equations 9, 10 and 11 by assuming that the force is directly applied to core member as shown in Figure 3 and the friction between core member and restraining material is negligible [8] which means the force is transversally distributed and no longitudinal interaction.…”
Section: The Ultimate Strength (Critical Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…) of BRB can be calculated from the Equation 12 deduced from Equations 9, 10 and 11 by assuming that the force is directly applied to core member as shown in Figure 3 and the friction between core member and restraining material is negligible [8] which means the force is transversally distributed and no longitudinal interaction.…”
Section: The Ultimate Strength (Critical Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the seismic capacity of the structure that have been built before updating the codes cannot be considered to be safe without checking it against updated codes. It is very important to strengthen the existing building structures that do not conform to the current codes because significant human and economic losses have occurred in earthquakes [6,7] and many countries cannot afford to demolish and build new structures Buckling restrained braces have been proven efficient in increasing the seismic stiffness of the structure because of their full hysteretic curves [8,9]. Results from the experiments conducted by Mazzolani et al [10], on retrofitting of damaged structures showed that the seismic performance of steel structures can be improved by both buckling restrained(BRB) braces and eccentric braces, but the first provided larger displacement capacity and they proved that with BRB the increase in stiffness and strength can be better controlled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the core element is made of steel material. For the encasing, concrete encasing [6][7][8] or all-steel encasing [9,10] is generally preferred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avcı-Karatas et al [2] used 1.5 mm for gap size between aluminum/steel core and concrete encasing. A gap size of 1.5 mm between the steel core and steel encasing was utilized by Guo et al [9]. AlHamaydeh et al [14] adopted 2.54 mm for the gap size between the steel core and concrete encasing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation