2018
DOI: 10.1080/1573062x.2018.1475578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subatmospheric pressure in a water draining pipeline with an air pocket

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To verify the proposed model, comparisons between computed and measured air pocket pressure oscillations were conducted using a constant friction factor of 0.018, considering the previous work published by the authors [16]. The water column located from X = 0 m to X = 3.4 m (see Figure 3) represents a boundary condition of the system since according to the observations it remains static during all measurements; then, it was neglected for the analysis in the mathematical model.…”
Section: Model Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To verify the proposed model, comparisons between computed and measured air pocket pressure oscillations were conducted using a constant friction factor of 0.018, considering the previous work published by the authors [16]. The water column located from X = 0 m to X = 3.4 m (see Figure 3) represents a boundary condition of the system since according to the observations it remains static during all measurements; then, it was neglected for the analysis in the mathematical model.…”
Section: Model Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, recent works have been developed to understand the behavior of an air pocket and setting operational rules in the emptying process to prevent future accidents. Several works have been published recently on the numerical simulation of the emptying process using one-dimensional (1D) models in case of having air inside a pipe [16,17]. Other works using advanced CFD techniques have been undertaken on the dynamic behavior of an air pocket over drainage and the effect of backflow air entrance [15,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herein, a simplified mathematical model is presented for computing extreme values of main hydraulic and thermodynamic variables in draining and filling operations in water installations when neither an admitted nor expelled air flow exists for draining and filling operations, respectively [22,23]. The authors neglected the inertial term (dv/dt = 0) of the water phase [24,25]; consequently, the quasi-static flow model was obtained. Therefore, the simulation of these operations in water installations was based on three formulations: the quasi-static flow model to represent the water phase [1], the polytropic equation of an entrapped air pocket [26,27], and the piston flow model to simulate air-water interactions [28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En estudios anteriores, el modelo matemático desarrollado por los autores se ha validado mediante ensayos de laboratorio con y sin ventosas y también con varias bolsas de aire en perfiles irregulares (Coronado-Hernández, 2017). Las dimensiones de estas instalaciones son pequeñas, con diámetros nominales inferiores a 63 mm y longitudes menores a 7.3 m (Coronado-Hernández, 2017Fuertes-Miquel, 2018a). En este trabajo se pretende validar el modelo para situaciones donde no se había analizado con anterioridad, para instalaciones reales de gran tamaño.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified