1991
DOI: 10.1088/0268-1242/6/6/023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subband dependent mobilities and carrier saturation mechanisms in thin Si doping layers in GaAs in the high density limit

Abstract: Shubnikov-de Haas and persistent photoconductivity measurements have been performed as a function of hydrostatic pressure to study the saturation of the free electron concentration and the mobilities of the individual subbands at high doping densities in very thin sheets (2. 5. 10 nm) of silicon donors in MBE GaAs. The samples were grown at very low temperature (400 "C) in order to limit dopant diffusion, and silicon concentrations were close to the solubility limit at this temperature. As has been shown previ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The thickness of the δ-layer is used as an adjustable parameter in the calculations and amounts to 160 Å and 340Å for samples N2 and N7, respectively. This value is rather large compared to typical values for Si δ-layers [23][24][25] (20-100 Å), and is due to the large ability of Sn to segregate [4]. Another mechanism, which might result in a relatively large width, is the repulsive interaction between the ionised impurities [26].…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The thickness of the δ-layer is used as an adjustable parameter in the calculations and amounts to 160 Å and 340Å for samples N2 and N7, respectively. This value is rather large compared to typical values for Si δ-layers [23][24][25] (20-100 Å), and is due to the large ability of Sn to segregate [4]. Another mechanism, which might result in a relatively large width, is the repulsive interaction between the ionised impurities [26].…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Several calculations of electron mobilities, excluding DX centers and assuming the measured free-electron concentration equal to the doping density, have been performed for ␦-doped GaAs structures, and reasonable agreement was obtained with the experimental findings. 3,4 However, the quantum mobilities measured by Skuras et al 5 in ␦-doped GaAs structures with a very high doping density (1.1ϫ10 13 cm Ϫ2 ) in the presence of an external hydrostatic pressure up to 20 kbar cannot be explained by the existing theory described in Refs. 3 and 4 due to population of DX centers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Therefore, an increase in the electron density of all occupied subbands should be observed after illumination as the DX centers revert to singly ionized shallow donor states. 13,14 In contrast, electron trapping states not connected to Si but distributed uniformly throughout the InAlAs will pin E F in a manner similar to background acceptors. [15][16][17][18] Such states will cause preferential removal of free electrons from the higher subbands of the ␦-doped region; this is the observed response for the In 0.52 Al 0.48 As samples discussed here.…”
Section: CMmentioning
confidence: 99%