2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04300-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subclassification of pT3 upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Park et al. introduced the pT3 subclassification defined by the presence of peripelvic/periureteral fat invasion, 9 which was supported by a recent study confirming its usefulness 12 . In our study, we adopted the definition proposed by Park et al., 9 and validated the results of the previous studies 9,12 using a relatively large cohort.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Furthermore, Park et al. introduced the pT3 subclassification defined by the presence of peripelvic/periureteral fat invasion, 9 which was supported by a recent study confirming its usefulness 12 . In our study, we adopted the definition proposed by Park et al., 9 and validated the results of the previous studies 9,12 using a relatively large cohort.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The present study focuses on elevated C-reactive protein levels after radical surgery, which may reflect the presence of micrometastases [21]. Other studies demonstrated several prognostic factors including pathological lymph node metastasis [21], histological high grade [22], lymphovascular invasion [23,24], and hydronephrosis [17]. However, these were not determined as independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis (Table 3).…”
Section: Cuaj -Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The prognostic impact of T2 is very close to that of T3 as seen in our established nomogram, suggesting that the significance of preoperative differentiation between T2 and T3 may be limited, while preoperative identification of T4 is necessary. We also carried out a subgroup analysis in light of the possibility that pT3 renal pelvis carcinoma and pT3 ureteral carcinoma have different prognosis ( 34 , 35 ). Unfortunately, there was no statistically significant difference in OS between pT3 renal pelvis carcinoma, pT3 ureteral carcinoma, and pT2 UTUC ( Figure S1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%