2022
DOI: 10.1093/qmath/haac027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subconvexity in Inhomogeneous Vinogradov Systems

Abstract: When k and s are natural numbers and ${\mathbf h}\in {\mathbb Z}^k$, denote by $J_{s,k}(X;\,{\mathbf h})$ the number of integral solutions of the system $$ \sum_{i=1}^s(x_i^j-y_i^j)=h_j\quad (1\leqslant j\leqslant k), $$ with $1\leqslant x_i,y_i\leqslant X$. When $s\lt k(k+1)/2$ and $(h_1,\ldots ,h_{k-1})\ne {\mathbf 0}$, Brandes and Hughes have shown that $J_{s,k}(X;\,{\mathbf h})=o(X^s)$. In this paper we improve on quantitative aspects of this result, and, subject to an extension of the main conjecture in V… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this work shows, inter alia, that Bs(X;h)=o(Xs)$B_s(X;{\mathbf {h}})=o(X^s)$ for s5$s\leqslant 5$, their methods fall short of providing conclusions for the critical exponent s=6$s=6$ addressed by Theorem 1.1. We remark that quantitative aspects of their conclusions have been sharpened in work [19] of the author.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…While this work shows, inter alia, that Bs(X;h)=o(Xs)$B_s(X;{\mathbf {h}})=o(X^s)$ for s5$s\leqslant 5$, their methods fall short of providing conclusions for the critical exponent s=6$s=6$ addressed by Theorem 1.1. We remark that quantitative aspects of their conclusions have been sharpened in work [19] of the author.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%