2019
DOI: 10.1111/adb.12830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcortical surface morphometry in substance dependence: An ENIGMA addiction working group study

Abstract: While imaging studies have demonstrated volumetric differences in subcortical structures associated with dependence on various abused substances, findings to date have not been wholly consistent. Moreover, most studies have not compared brain morphology across those dependent on different substances of abuse to identify substance-specific and substance-general dependence effects. By pooling large multina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ENIGMA-Addiction Working Group is currently expanding this work to investigate sex-specific neuroimaging signatures of alcohol (Grace et al, in press), tobacco, cocaine (Rabin et al, in press), and methamphetamine using a global framework. This type of big data analysis is ideal for parsing the complexity of SUDs in the brain, as has been shown by our earlier work [Chye et al, 2019;Mackey et al, 2019].…”
Section: Substance Use Disordersmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The ENIGMA-Addiction Working Group is currently expanding this work to investigate sex-specific neuroimaging signatures of alcohol (Grace et al, in press), tobacco, cocaine (Rabin et al, in press), and methamphetamine using a global framework. This type of big data analysis is ideal for parsing the complexity of SUDs in the brain, as has been shown by our earlier work [Chye et al, 2019;Mackey et al, 2019].…”
Section: Substance Use Disordersmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Other methodological WGs have focused on anatomical shape analyses that enable a more precise characterization of regional brain alterations thus resolving subregional effects in the basal ganglia, amygdala, and hippocampus 55,85,[137][138][139][140][141][142] . Other approaches currently used in ENIGMA include brain structural covariance analysis graph theory approach for intra-individual brain structural covariance networks in OCD 77,143 , sulcal morphometry 144 , hippocampal subfield analysis [80][81][82]145 and disease effects on lateralization (in OCD, MDD, and ASD) 71,90,97 .…”
Section: Enigma-methods Focused Working Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ENIGMA-Addictions/SUDs WG has 33 participating sites, contributing MRI data from 12,347 individuals of whom 2277 are adult patients with SUD relating to one of five substances (alcohol, nicotine, cocaine, methamphetamine, or cannabis) 5,84,85 . In these data, Mackey 5 observed lower cortical thickness/subcortical volume in cases relative to controls in regions that play key roles in evaluating reward (MOFC, amygdala), task monitoring (superior frontal cortex), attention (superior parietal cortex, posterior cingulate) and perception/regulation of internal body states (insula).…”
Section: Enigma-addictions/sudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers need to consider whether imaging analyses should use measures obtained at every point of an image (e.g., voxelwise or vertexwise data) or aggregate measures computed over regions of interest or parcellations, broadly termed as "ROIs". Although vertexwise analyses have been performed in recent ENIGMA research (Chye et al, 2019;Ho et al, 2019), most previous ENIGMA studies used meta-analyses. In these cases, an ROI-based approach is more robust to small deviations from a common image registration scheme.…”
Section: Choice Of Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%