2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcortical volumes differentiate Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, and remitted Major Depressive Disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
62
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
5
62
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We should note here that our results do not replicate previously reported differences in caudate volumes between [12][13][14][15] and it is possible that the observed group differences were qualified by an interaction with age. Other studies examined a different age group than we did, 13 and many had smaller samples (e.g., patient groups of fewer than 30 individuals).…”
Section: J Psychiatry Neurosci 2017;42(3)contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We should note here that our results do not replicate previously reported differences in caudate volumes between [12][13][14][15] and it is possible that the observed group differences were qualified by an interaction with age. Other studies examined a different age group than we did, 13 and many had smaller samples (e.g., patient groups of fewer than 30 individuals).…”
Section: J Psychiatry Neurosci 2017;42(3)contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 Finally, researchers have reported that the putamen is activated most strongly during anticipation of reward, whereas the caudate is activated most strongly during the receipt of reward. 8,10,11 A growing body of research indicates that adults with MDD have smaller volumes of the caudate [12][13][14][15] and putamen 13,14,16,17 than healthy controls. Postmortem studies have also reported smaller putamen volumes in depressed than in nondepressed adults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…report a lower classification accuracy of 59.5% (20). Similarly in our recent work we could demonstrate that patients with schizophrenia can be separated from depressed patients with 76% accuracy based on structural MRI data (18).…”
Section: Future Challenges For Neuroimaging-based Classification Of Dsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In this context, a recent metaanalysis showed that patients with schizophrenia can be accurately differentiated from healthy volunteers in 80% of the cases using only neuroimaging-based diagnostic models (17). Moreover, these methods may facilitate the development of neuroimaging tools to distinguish among different psychiatric disorders (18)(19)(20)(21) or to predict clinical outcomes (22)(23)(24). Indeed, multiple proof-of-concept studies have successfully used multivariate statistical methods to guide the diagnosis of depression based on structural MRI (sMRI) data (19; 21; 25-27), resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) data (26; 28-34), and task-based functional MRI (fMRI) data (35)(36)(37)(38)(39).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prefrontal cortex and limbic areas are fundamental to emotion processing and mood regulation 3 , and these areas have also been consistently implicated in imaging studies of MDD [4][5][6] . As the use of automated methods such as voxel-based morphometry 7,8 and Freesurfer 9 have increased, this has expanded the search across the whole brain. In general, structural abnormalities have been reported across diverse brain networks in MDD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%