2022
DOI: 10.1214/22-ecp496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcritical bootstrap percolation via Toom contours

Abstract: In this note we provide an alternative proof of the fact that subcritical bootstrap percolation models have a positive critical probability in any dimension. The proof relies on a recent extension of the classical framework of Toom. This approach is not only simpler than the original multi-scale renormalisation proof of the result in two and more dimensions, but also gives significantly better bounds. As a byproduct, we improve the best known bounds for the stability threshold of Toom's North-East-Center major… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, and observe that h i (x ′ ) ≠ h i+1 (x ′ ), where x ′ is the projection of x onto {u} ⊥ , since x ∈ Q 1 ⊂ P, and we assumed that P does not intersect Σ + 4𝛾 ⋅ L (i) u . It follows, by (14), that there exists z ∈ Z i with 𝑑(x ′ , z) < 2 −6 𝜋 ⋅ g i . Let y ∈ Y be such that z is the orthogonal projection of y onto {u} ⊥ , and let Q 2 be the (i)-cube containing y.…”
Section: Construction Of Pinches Avoiding Bad Cubesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, and observe that h i (x ′ ) ≠ h i+1 (x ′ ), where x ′ is the projection of x onto {u} ⊥ , since x ∈ Q 1 ⊂ P, and we assumed that P does not intersect Σ + 4𝛾 ⋅ L (i) u . It follows, by (14), that there exists z ∈ Z i with 𝑑(x ′ , z) < 2 −6 𝜋 ⋅ g i . Let y ∈ Y be such that z is the orthogonal projection of y onto {u} ⊥ , and let Q 2 be the (i)-cube containing y.…”
Section: Construction Of Pinches Avoiding Bad Cubesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The main aim of this paper is to prove the following theorem, which confirms one direction of this conjecture. We remark that an alternative (very different) proof of this theorem has been given by Hartarsky and Szabó [14], using a method that was developed recently by Swart, Szabó and Toninelli [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%