2008
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcutaneous‐induced membranes have no osteoinductive effect on macroporous HA‐TCP in vivo

Abstract: Induced Membranes Technique was first described to enhance bone reconstruction of large osseous defects. Previous in vitro studies established their osteoinductive potential, due to the presence of opteoblasts precursors and to high amounts of growth factors contained within. The purpose of this study was to test in vivo the osteoinductive properties of induced membranes on a macroporous HA-TCP in a nonosseous subcutaneous site. Subcutaneous-induced membranes were obtained in 21 rabbits; 1 month later, the mem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon comparison to PDC, the induced membrane-derived cells had a similar colony-forming and differentiation capacity; however they did express higher levels SDF1α, a protein that is known to be involved in the recruitment of progenitors to the site of injury. It is currently unclear what the origin of these progenitors is, however, the assumption that they may come from the periosteum is supported as induced membranes which were formed subcutaneously have no bone-forming capacity in conjunction with a calcium phosphate biomaterial [100].…”
Section: Tissue Engineering Strategies Mimicking the Periosteum In Itmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon comparison to PDC, the induced membrane-derived cells had a similar colony-forming and differentiation capacity; however they did express higher levels SDF1α, a protein that is known to be involved in the recruitment of progenitors to the site of injury. It is currently unclear what the origin of these progenitors is, however, the assumption that they may come from the periosteum is supported as induced membranes which were formed subcutaneously have no bone-forming capacity in conjunction with a calcium phosphate biomaterial [100].…”
Section: Tissue Engineering Strategies Mimicking the Periosteum In Itmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le principal effet de la membrane est celui de mainteneur d'espace alors que les effets sur la prévention de la résorption du greffon et la sécrétion de facteurs ostéo-inducteurs par la membrane sont encore discutés [22,65]. L'état tissulaire local antérieur a également une influence sur le succès de cette technique car les suites opératoires ont été plus favorables avec les ostéo-myélites (100 % de succès) [9] qu'avec les ostéoradionécroses (50 % de succès) [19].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Deux articles [9,22] ont présenté des cas de reconstruction mandibulaire par la technique des membranes induites, initialement décrite pour la reconstruction des os longs [23,24]. Cette méthode a été utilisée à la mandibule pour traiter des cas d'ostéomyélites et d'ostéoradioné-croses [9,19].…”
Section: Résultatsunclassified
“…The technique is efficient in debilitated patients, but would be more effective in non-irradiated patients in good general health. The authors recently published part of this study showing that subcutaneous induced membranes have no osteoinductive effect on macroporous HA-TCP in vivo 29 . A further study using artificial bones placed subcutaneously with osseous bone growth factors is underway.…”
Section: Patient Studymentioning
confidence: 98%