2017
DOI: 10.1002/mus.25643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcutaneous versus intravenous immunoglobulin for chronic autoimmune neuropathies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major challenge with SCIg is skin irritation, which is dose‐dependent, but also seems to lessen with time 63 . It is safe and reasonable to consider switching from IVIg to SCIg for convenience, poor intravenous access, end‐of‐dose wear‐off effect, or adverse events with intravenous infusions 64 . However, before switching, patients must be stable on IVIg, as there is currently insufficient evidence for SCIg as inductive therapy in treatment‐naive CIDP patients.…”
Section: Existing Therapies: Standard Of Practice and Comparative Effmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major challenge with SCIg is skin irritation, which is dose‐dependent, but also seems to lessen with time 63 . It is safe and reasonable to consider switching from IVIg to SCIg for convenience, poor intravenous access, end‐of‐dose wear‐off effect, or adverse events with intravenous infusions 64 . However, before switching, patients must be stable on IVIg, as there is currently insufficient evidence for SCIg as inductive therapy in treatment‐naive CIDP patients.…”
Section: Existing Therapies: Standard Of Practice and Comparative Effmentioning
confidence: 99%