2006
DOI: 10.1007/11784203_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subdivision Depth Computation for Extra-Ordinary Catmull-Clark Subdivision Surface Patches

Abstract: Abstract.A second order forward differences based subdivision depth computation technique for extra-ordinary Catmull-Clark subdivision surface (CCSS) patches is presented. The new technique improves a previous technique in that the computation of the subdivision depth is based on the patch's curvature distribution, instead of its dimension. Hence, with the new technique, no excessive subdivision is needed for extra-ordinary CCSS patches to meet the precision requirement and, consequently, one can make trimming… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the estimate does not match observations and is not practically useful. Similar estimates, ever more sophisticated in the details, can be found in [3,5,4,9,10].…”
Section: Review Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…the estimate does not match observations and is not practically useful. Similar estimates, ever more sophisticated in the details, can be found in [3,5,4,9,10].…”
Section: Review Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The error between the subdivision mesh computed at subdivision level k and its limit surface, S(u, v), is then bounded as the following [CCY06]:…”
Section: Error-bounded Subdivisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zeng and Chen [ZC06] provide estimates based on the first differences of the control mesh, but these are over‐conservative and lead to a large prediction for the number of required steps. Cheng et al [CY06, CCY06, CC06] make improved estimates based on second differences instead. Huang and Wang [HW07b] find optimal convergence rates for these second differences, but still predict a large number of subdivision steps compared to typical use in practice.…”
Section: Analysis Of Subdivision Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%