2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2003.01984.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subduction-zone structure and magmatic processes beneath Costa Rica constrained by local earthquake tomography and petrological modelling

Abstract: SUMMARY A high‐quality data set of 3790 earthquakes were simultaneously inverted for hypocentre locations and 3‐D P‐wave velocities in Costa Rica. Tests with synthetic data and resolution estimates derived from the resolution matrix indicate that the velocity model is well constrained in central Costa Rica to a depth of 70 km; northwestern and southeastern Costa Rica are less well resolved owing to a lack of seismic stations and seismicity. Maximum H2O content and seismic wave speeds of mid‐ocean ridge basalt … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

21
154
1
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(161 reference statements)
21
154
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In subduction zones, such as Costa Rica, a delay of 1 sec is not unrealistically large and, hence, may not be easily detected in the data. A systematic error of 1 sec at one station will certainly introduce a large local velocity variation, but this anomaly will not appear as an obvious artifact in comparison with the velocity variations normally expected in complex regions such as subduction zones, which can be easily in the order of 10% (see, e.g., Husen et al, 2003). In summary, systematic errors such as the ones documented in this article will likely go undetected in the data and the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In subduction zones, such as Costa Rica, a delay of 1 sec is not unrealistically large and, hence, may not be easily detected in the data. A systematic error of 1 sec at one station will certainly introduce a large local velocity variation, but this anomaly will not appear as an obvious artifact in comparison with the velocity variations normally expected in complex regions such as subduction zones, which can be easily in the order of 10% (see, e.g., Husen et al, 2003). In summary, systematic errors such as the ones documented in this article will likely go undetected in the data and the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…To have an idea of the effect of station mislocations on earthquake hypocenter locations, we used two events recorded by station PAL as an example. We computed synthetic arrival times for all stations that recorded those two events using the 3D velocity model calculated by Husen et al (2003). To be more realistic, we introduced normal distributed Gaussian noise with a variance equal to the quality class Period 1a.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…RALT posee menor amplificación que RMOI, pero mientras que RALT no posee picos claramente identificables, RMOI posee un valor de amplificación bastante notorio cercano a los 1,2 Hz. Este valor pico sería importante para eventos fuertes y lejanos, que son frecuentes en la costa pacífica de Costa Rica (DeShon et al, 2003;Husen et al, 2003; Protti et al, 1995), y que pueden excitar ese punto de vibración del suelo y tener repercusiones en estructuras elevadas o que contienen líquidos como lo son los tanques de almacenamiento de combustible. SISD está ubicada al pie del valle de San Isidro de El General.…”
Section: Discusión Y Resultadosunclassified
“…For central Costa Rica, where the seamount segment of the Cocos plate subducts, local earthquake seismic tomography data by Husen et al (2003), Arroyo et al (2009) and Dinc et al (2010) show a shallower subduction angle. The deep structure of the subduction zone for the Cocos Ridge segment is less constrained with receiver function data by Dzierma et al (2011) and earthquake hypocenter data by Arroyo (2001) and Arroyo et al (2003), showing the presence of a steeply subducting slab down to a depth of 70 km.…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%