2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-012-1472-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subfactors of Index Less Than 5, Part 3: Quadruple Points

Abstract: Abstract. One major obstacle in extending the classification of small index subfactors beyond 3 + √ 3 is the appearance of infinite families of candidate principal graphs with 4-valent vertices (in particular, the "weeds" Q and Q from Part 1 [MS10]). Thus instead of using triple point obstructions to eliminate candidate graphs, we need to develop new quadruple point obstructions. In this paper we prove two quadruple point obstructions. The first uses quadratic tangles techniques and eliminates the weed Q immed… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently the classification has been extended up to index 5, and even beyond. See [JMS14,MS12,MPPS12,IJMS12,PT12]. Such classifications would not be possible without the reduction of the subfactor problem to an essentially combinatorial one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently the classification has been extended up to index 5, and even beyond. See [JMS14,MS12,MPPS12,IJMS12,PT12]. Such classifications would not be possible without the reduction of the subfactor problem to an essentially combinatorial one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a triple point obstruction due to Ocneanu shows that as long as the index is at least 4 the initial triple point must be at odd depth. These triple point obstructions play a crucial role in the classification of small index subfactors [Haa94,MS10,MPPS10,IJMS11,PT10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main result of this paper is a mutual generalization of these two triple point obstructions which proves the stronger conclusion using only the weaker assumptions. As one might expect, this paper uses a mix of connections and planar algebras following [IJMS11]. Furthermore, one can think of this argument as giving an alternate proof of the triple point obstruction from [Jon03].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This combinatorial data was axiomatized in three slightly different structures: paragroups [Ocn88], λ-lattices [Pop95], and planar algebras [Jon99]. When combined, these viewpoints produce strong results, e.g., standard invariants with index in (4,5) are completely classified, excluding the A ∞ standard invariant at each index value [Pop93] (see [MS11,MPPS11,IJMS11,PT11] for more details).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%