1997
DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100150319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subfracture insult to a knee joint causes alterations in the bone and in the functional stiffness of overlying cartilage

Abstract: The current criteria used by the automotive industry for predicting joint injury are based on fracture of bone, but clinical studies suggest that chronic diseases such as osteoarthrosis can occur from a single blunt insult without bone fracture. In the current study, blunt insults were delivered to the patellofemoral joints of rabbits without producing bone fractures. Biomechanical and histological studies were performed on joint tissues at various times after insult. The functional integrity of the retropatel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
38
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One explanation for this result may be related to the significant change documented in the histological character of the impacted cartilage in the cage-activity group between years 1 and 2. Histological sections of retro-patellar tissue in the earlier study at 1 year (Newberry et al, 1997) did not show significant ossification/calcification, erosion and extensive loss of surface integrity in the impacted versus non-impacted limbs, in contrast to that shown in the current study. The histology of impacted cartilage after 1 year of cageactivity was described as being more similar to that of the exercise group in the current study, in which the impacted cartilage was also softer than that of the nonimpacted limb.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One explanation for this result may be related to the significant change documented in the histological character of the impacted cartilage in the cage-activity group between years 1 and 2. Histological sections of retro-patellar tissue in the earlier study at 1 year (Newberry et al, 1997) did not show significant ossification/calcification, erosion and extensive loss of surface integrity in the impacted versus non-impacted limbs, in contrast to that shown in the current study. The histology of impacted cartilage after 1 year of cageactivity was described as being more similar to that of the exercise group in the current study, in which the impacted cartilage was also softer than that of the nonimpacted limb.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…In a previous study from this laboratory 12 months of cage activity following a 6 J impact on the PF joint resulted in a statistically significant softening of the retro-patellar cartilage, based on G U from the Hayes et al (1972) solution (Newberry et al, 1997). A comparison with the current study would suggest that an additional year of cage activity must have resulted in a stiffening of the impacted cartilage with respect to the non-impacted limb.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Cracking ofGartilage seen in animal models of OA [17,19,20] have been shown to be co-localized with acellularity in the cracked tissue [ 191, and regions of chondrocyte apoptosis [l]. Since simple cuts in cartilage do not lead to progression [26] it is likely cell death and tissue disruption is needed for progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-traumatic cracking of cartilage has been seen in human joints in vivo, and increased cracking was associated with higher histological damage scores indicating cell death or injury [14]. So the spatial relationship between matrix cracks and non-viable cells may be of clinical importance [20] and it is easy to imagine progression to full-depth cracks, even with normal joint loading [25,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Several impact models have been used to study the processes leading to cartilage degeneration. The most common trauma caused by impact loading are fissures at the cartilage surface in the middle of the impacted zone, which extend downward at approximately 45 degrees into the superficial, [4][5][6][7][8] middle, 9,10 or deep 11,12 zones. Excessive shear stresses, 13 excessive tensile stresses, 14 or excessive principal strains, [15][16][17][18] might cause the formation of these cracks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%