Aim:The phase II/III GATSBY study (NCT01641939) showed that trastuzumab emtansine did not have an efficacy benefit over taxane in patients with previously treated, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. We evaluated patients from Japanese centers within GATSBY.Methods: In stage one, patients (randomized 2:2:1) received trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg every 3 weeks, trastuzumab emtansine 2.4 mg/kg weekly, or physician's choice of taxane (docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks or paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 weekly). In stage two, patients (randomized 2:1) received trastuzumab emtansine 2.4 mg/kg weekly or taxane. Eligible patients had centrally assessed HER2-positive disease and progression during or after first-line therapy.Primary endpoint was overall survival. We present the 2.4 mg/kg weekly data.Results: Eighty-two patients were randomized (intention-to-treat: 48 to trastuzumab emtansine 2.4 mg/kg weekly, 23 to taxane; September 2012-August 2014) at 19 sites. Median overall survival was 11.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI],.3) with trastuzumab emtansine 2.4 mg/kg weekly and 10.0 months (95% CI, 7.1-18.2) with taxane (unstratified hazard ratio = 0.94, 95% CI, 0.52-1.72). Trastuzumab emtansine 2.4 mg/kg weekly, versus taxane, was associated with fewer grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs; 52.1% vs 68.2%) and serious AEs (14.6% vs 18.2%). There were no fatal AEs.Asia-Pac J Clin Oncol. 2020;16:5-13. c