“…There were no individuals classified as Amerindian or Caucasian by phenotype in this commuStudies in an African-descendant isolate 25 Sources: (1) Africans - (Deka et al, 1999;Destro-Bisol et al, 2000;Huguet et al, 1998;Bosh et al, 2001;Gene et al, 2001;Alves et al, 2001;Brinkmann et al, 1996;Brinkmann et al, 1998;Rolf et al, 1998;Wang et al, 2002;Pérez-Lezaun et al, 1997;Yunis et al, 2000;Corte-Real et al, 2000;Dios et al, 1998); (2) Europeans (Pérez- Lezaun et al, 2000;Anjos et al, 2000;Lourdes-Pontes et al, 1998;Asmundo et al, 1998;Santos et al, 1996;Souto et al, 1996, Souto et al, 1998Alves et al, 2001;Pinheiro et al, 1996;Amorim et al, 1996;Pereira et al, 1996;Gusmão et al, 1997;Espinheira et al, 1996;Miranda et al, 1998;Prata et al, 1998) nity. This date on phenotypic ethnic classification is based on facial morphological characteristics and skin color in body regions not exposed to the sun (Azevêdo, 1980). As regards anthropologic characteristics, the Bananal community NCI was 0.24, a median value compared to that expected for an African derived population (Azevêdo et al,1982), possibly due to a founder effect related to the fact that few surnames with religious connotation were present in the initial composition of the community.…”