What are the characteristics of primary angle closure with longer axial length? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59:1354-1359. https://doi.org/10.1167 PURPOSE. To compare biometric parameters between primary angle closure with longer axial length (AL) and those with medium or shorter AL.
METHODS.We prospectively recruited 138 primary angle-closure patients. Low-coherence interferometry and ultrasound biomicroscopy examinations were performed before laser peripheral iridotomy and pilocarpine treatment. AL was categorized as shorter (<22.5 mm), medium ( ‡22.5 to <23.5 mm), or longer ( ‡23.5 mm). Anterior chamber depth and width (ACD and ACW), lens vault (LV), anterior vault (AV), relative AV (AV/AL), relative lens position (RLP, [ACD þ 1/2 lens thickness]/AL), trabecular-ciliary angle (TCA), keratometry, and other biometric parameters were compared among different AL groups.RESULTS. Among 138 angle-closure patients, 15 (10.9%) patients had longer ALs, of which 11 (73.3%) were male. These angle-closure eyes with longer AL had flatter cornea (P ¼ 0.006 and 0.022 for flat and steep keratometry) and larger ACW (P ¼ 0.006), but smaller RLP (P ¼ 0.019) than those with medium AL; similarly, they had flatter cornea (P < 0.001 for both flat and steep keratometry), and larger ACW (P < 0.001), AV (P ¼ 0.004), and TCA (P ¼ 0.024), but smaller relative AV (P ¼ 0.040) and RLP (P ¼ 0.005) than those with shorter AL. No significant differences were found in the other parameters.CONCLUSIONS. Primary angle closure with longer AL was uncommon. Causes of angle closure in these atypical patients were manifold. These patients were predominantly male; they had smaller relative dimension of the anterior segment, flatter cornea, and more anterior RLP and less anteriorly rotated ciliary body compared with those angle-closure patients with relatively shorter AL.Keywords: myopia, primary angle closure, axial length, biometric parameters P rimary angle closure (PAC) with myopia has received increasing attention in recent years. This is not only because myopia, usually regarded as a protective effect against PAC, can still be observed in some angle-closure patients, 1-4 but also because this kind of PAC may significantly rise with the incremental rate of myopia in East Asia in the future.5 Recent researchers have highlighted that there is a considerable proportion of myopia in the PAC population. A Singaporean study showed that almost one-quarter of PAC was myopic, 5 whereas a Malaysian investigation found that the distribution of myopia was approximately 37% in PAC patients.6 Jin et al. 7 concluded that the increasing prevalence of myopia has minimal influence on the angle-closure prevalence. It seems that we are going to have more myopic PAC with the rise of myopia in the world, especially in East Asia. However, myopia by the definition of the refractive status in angle-closure patients is often misleading. It is well known that PAC usually occurs in the population older than 40 years, 8 so the myopia formation in these patients might be...