2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2006.02001.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subinhibitory concentrations of cinnamaldehyde interfere with quorum sensing

Abstract: Aims:  To investigate the effect of cinnamaldehyde (CA) on transcription from selected quorum sensing (QS) promoters. Methods and Results:  The action of CA on QS was assayed using three E. coli green fluorescent protein (GFP) based bioreporters (two inducible and the other constitutive) and two Vibrio harveyi bioluminescent reporter strains. LuxR‐mediated transcription from the PluxI promoter, which is induced by 3‐oxo‐C6‐homoserine lactone (HSL), was reduced by 70 per cent following exposure to 200 μmol l−1 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
131
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
131
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our experiments are consistent with the notion that NC can interact with E. coli driven by an electrostatic interaction. The main significance of these results lies in the following: 1) Chitosancoated NC are non-toxic, even when they promote the aggregation of E. coli when added at a very narrow range of concentration; 2) NC themselves can inhibit the "hearing" or "sensing" component of bacterial QS; 3) In the same manner that 3OC6HSL was loaded into the oil core of NC, and it was delivered effectively to bacteria to trigger their QS response, it should be feasible to load compounds with QS inhibitory activity, such as cinnamaldehyde [62,63] and other. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our experiments are consistent with the notion that NC can interact with E. coli driven by an electrostatic interaction. The main significance of these results lies in the following: 1) Chitosancoated NC are non-toxic, even when they promote the aggregation of E. coli when added at a very narrow range of concentration; 2) NC themselves can inhibit the "hearing" or "sensing" component of bacterial QS; 3) In the same manner that 3OC6HSL was loaded into the oil core of NC, and it was delivered effectively to bacteria to trigger their QS response, it should be feasible to load compounds with QS inhibitory activity, such as cinnamaldehyde [62,63] and other. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have demonstrated its ability to disrupt QS signaling in Vibrio (281,282) and Burkholderia (283) species, and it or its structural analogues were effective at protecting Artemia shrimp (281) and C. elegans (284) from V. harveyi, V. anguilarum, and V. vulnificus infections while not inhibiting growth of the bacteria. The proposed mechanism of action for cinnamaldehyde is disruption of protein-DNA interactions of the QS-responsive master regulatory protein, LuxR (not to be confused with LuxR-type AHL receptors), with targeted promoter sequences.…”
Section: Natural-product Qs Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of cinnamaldehyde on LuxR-mediated transcription from the P luxI promoter, which is induced by 3-oxo-C 6 -AHL, was evaluated using the destabilized green fluorescent protein-based bioreporters E. coli ATCC 33456 pJBA89 and E. coli ATCC 33456 pJBA113. Niu et al, in 2006 proposed that the three carbon aliphatic side chain of cinnamaldehyde interferes with the binding of the smaller 3-hydroxy-C4-and 3-oxo-C 6 -HSLs to their cognate receptors, but was not sufficiently long enough to substantially reduce the binding of 3-oxo-C 12 -HSL to LasR. They also observed that cinnamaldehyde significantly reduced AI-2 mediated signalling.…”
Section: Essential Oils As Source Of Qsimentioning
confidence: 76%