2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subject clitics and preverbal negation in European French: Variation, acquisition, diatopy and diachrony

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the young children in our sample, however, whatever their age, simple negation remains the rule and bipartite negation is an exception. This result matches research establishing that young children and preteens very rarely produce this particle (Armstrong, 2002; Palasis, 2015, among others). Yet, this particularly low rate of bipartite negation observed at school may seem surprising, given the adults’ efforts to provide a more standard model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the young children in our sample, however, whatever their age, simple negation remains the rule and bipartite negation is an exception. This result matches research establishing that young children and preteens very rarely produce this particle (Armstrong, 2002; Palasis, 2015, among others). Yet, this particularly low rate of bipartite negation observed at school may seem surprising, given the adults’ efforts to provide a more standard model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The absence of ne has been considered a characteristic of children's language throughout the history of modern French. Late mastery of compound negation and very low rates of this variant in corpora have been observed in children aged under 12 3 (see among others Blanche‐Benveniste & Pallaud, 2001; Buson & Nardy, 2020; Dufter & Stark, 2007; Martineau & Mougeon, 2003; Palasis, 2015). Armstrong (2002) observes minimal use of ne (below 2% on average) among the teenagers (age 11–19) in his corpus, with, nevertheless, higher percentages in interviews with the researcher and/or when the topic is serious, compared with conversations with peers.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Preschool children are therefore expected to initially handle G1 only and develop G2 later. Palasis (2013Palasis ( , 2015 highlighted this asynchrony in kindergarten data, and showed that children consistently used the items of the same grammar within the boundaries of their utterances, as detailed in These facts are consistent with the diglossic hypothesis that French children start with G1 (no SCLI) and develop G2 (SCLI) only later.…”
Section: The Diglossic Hypothesissupporting
confidence: 66%
“…As it was mentioned, the category of negation is a philosophical, logical and linguistic phenomenon which opposed to affirmation in various strata and on different levels of the language structure. On the semantic level, there is always an opposition of positive and negative (antonymic relations): long-short, good-bad, etc (Palasis, 2015;Butt & Lahiri, 2013). On the lexical level when the affix denotes negation: negative prefix + root: natural -unnatural, proper -improper, regularirregular; root + negative suffix: shame -shameless, cheer -cheerless.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%