2016
DOI: 10.1177/0267658316659106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subject expression in L2 Spanish: Convergence of generative and usage-based perspectives?

Abstract: The extensive literature on subject expression in Spanish makes for rich comparisons between generative (formal) and usage-based (functional) approaches to language acquisition. This article explores how the problem of subject expression has been conceptualized within each research tradition, as well as unanswered questions that both approaches must consider in order to strengthen and refine their positions. The discussion focuses on convergence between the approaches, which stems from the contemporary interes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(113 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, generative approaches are better at connecting properties that are superficially unrelated but underlyingly linked to the same parameter, for example, properties that emerge at the same time in development (Snyder, 2001), precisely because the granularity of the formal theory employed can account for this and, in fact, even predicts this. There remain plenty of properties that allow a head-to-head framework comparison, see specifically Shantz (2017) and Zyzik (2017) for some good examples. Where we differ incommensurably is in delineating the parts of language that are claimed to be truly universal and otherwise unacquirable, that is, PoS properties illustrating the logical problem of acquisition.…”
Section: Conclusion: a Place For Multiple Theories In Slamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, generative approaches are better at connecting properties that are superficially unrelated but underlyingly linked to the same parameter, for example, properties that emerge at the same time in development (Snyder, 2001), precisely because the granularity of the formal theory employed can account for this and, in fact, even predicts this. There remain plenty of properties that allow a head-to-head framework comparison, see specifically Shantz (2017) and Zyzik (2017) for some good examples. Where we differ incommensurably is in delineating the parts of language that are claimed to be truly universal and otherwise unacquirable, that is, PoS properties illustrating the logical problem of acquisition.…”
Section: Conclusion: a Place For Multiple Theories In Slamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This special issue includes two articles taking a formal approach (Yang and Montrul, 2017, this issue; Bardovi-Harlig and Stringer, 2017, this issue), two articles taking a functional approach (Zyzik, 2017, this issue; Paquot, 2017, this issue), and one article testing both approaches (Shantz, 2017, this issue).…”
Section: The Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%