2022
DOI: 10.1109/tmrb.2022.3144025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subject-Independent, Biological Hip Moment Estimation During Multimodal Overground Ambulation Using Deep Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They didn't however compare the performance to FCN or transformers. On the other hand, a study by Molinaro et al [46] found that the LSTM outperforms the FCN in joint moment prediction, which is similar to the result of our study, where the LSTM outperforms the FCN in one-step-ahead predictions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…They didn't however compare the performance to FCN or transformers. On the other hand, a study by Molinaro et al [46] found that the LSTM outperforms the FCN in joint moment prediction, which is similar to the result of our study, where the LSTM outperforms the FCN in one-step-ahead predictions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although limited to an instrumented treadmill and not yet suitable for autonomous exoskeletons, similar approaches may increase the understanding of how exoskeletons, which often augment the production of ankle power, interact with the body. Recent work has also used machine-learning techniques to estimate hip moments without requiring an instrumented treadmill 239 .…”
Section: Unimpaired Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, researchers are focusing on acquiring kinetics parameters through data-driven method [34]- [43], [43]- [46]. However, these studies are still relying on a large number of sensors [35], reversely acquired simulated IMU data from the retrospective motion capture data [34], [37], and highly repetitive treadmill/level-ground walking [36]- [43], [43]- [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, researchers are focusing on acquiring kinetics parameters through data-driven method [34]- [43], [43]- [46]. However, these studies are still relying on a large number of sensors [35], reversely acquired simulated IMU data from the retrospective motion capture data [34], [37], and highly repetitive treadmill/level-ground walking [36]- [43], [43]- [46]. Since experimentally collected IMU data contains noise induced from multi-frequncy vibration during the impact of the limb on the ground, the simulated IMU data that was acquired from retrospectively captured motion capture data may not provide a reliable kinetics estimation during real application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%