2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subject matter effects and the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
123
3
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
8
123
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it might explore the effects of both class level and agreement on student satisfaction and learning in online classes, to identify the importance of peer agreement on individual student outcomes. Another promising area is the effects of agreement in online classes in different disciplines, extending the research that has found individual-level differences (Arbaugh, 2005;Arbaugh, Bangert, & Cleveland-Innes, 2010).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Study And Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For example, it might explore the effects of both class level and agreement on student satisfaction and learning in online classes, to identify the importance of peer agreement on individual student outcomes. Another promising area is the effects of agreement in online classes in different disciplines, extending the research that has found individual-level differences (Arbaugh, 2005;Arbaugh, Bangert, & Cleveland-Innes, 2010).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Study And Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…program, the CoI survey instrument developed by Arbaugh et al (2008) was reviewed and adapted for extending the CoI constructs. The CoI survey was conceptually and empirically validated with a Cronbach's alpha reliability of .84 (.94 for teaching presence, .91 for social presence, and .95 for cognitive presence) across four higher education institutions (Arbaugh et al, 2008) and later used by researchers across disciplines and with large samples (Shea & Bidjerano, 2009;Arbaugh et al, 2010;Archibald, 2010). Arbaugh et al (2010) reported internal consistency reliabilities of .96 for teaching presence, .91 for social presence and .95 for cognitive presence after using the CoI survey with 1173 students from different disciplines.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive presence is influenced both by teaching presence and social presence in an online course Rovai, 2002;Meyer, 2003;Garrison & Cleveland-Innes, 2005;Arnold & Ducate, 2006;Archibald, 2010;Garrison et al, 2010), and has been found to be higher in disciplines that foster soft and applied skills (Arbaugh et al, 2010).…”
Section: Cognitive Presencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…And, just as with face-to-face, Arbaugh et al [36] note that, "disciplinary effects may have a strong effect on student satisfaction with online learning" (p39). Selwyn [37] investigated the "messy realities of student engagements with digital technology" by soliciting negative experiences under four headings: Distraction (diverting attention from study; e.g.…”
Section: Student Perceptions Of Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%