Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Subject-Oriented Business Process Management 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3329007.3329011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subject-oriented specification of IoT scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodological cornerstones for digital specifications mirroring CPS meet the representational demands on the specification level: agent-based systems and subject-oriented modeling. The latter has been explored recently for IoT system specification [ 36 ] and task-based CPS design [ 37 ], whereas agent-based behavior encapsulation features patterns that have been successfully used to build up system intelligence (given their inherent perception—decision—action sequence). Due to its modular design and easy-to-share notation, subject-oriented modeling allows enriching these patterns towards complex system design while keeping it understandable from a human perspective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodological cornerstones for digital specifications mirroring CPS meet the representational demands on the specification level: agent-based systems and subject-oriented modeling. The latter has been explored recently for IoT system specification [ 36 ] and task-based CPS design [ 37 ], whereas agent-based behavior encapsulation features patterns that have been successfully used to build up system intelligence (given their inherent perception—decision—action sequence). Due to its modular design and easy-to-share notation, subject-oriented modeling allows enriching these patterns towards complex system design while keeping it understandable from a human perspective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, models have been developed to better characterize the aspects of Industry 4.0 by adding attributes. This is the case of Performability-enabled BPMN (PyBPMN) which addresses the shortcomings of BPMN in terms of flexibility and performance especially for CPS and IoT Industry 4.0 business processes (Bocciarelli et al, 2017) and Subject-oriented Business Process Management (S-BPM) which also corrects the shortcomings of BPMN for IoT through a representation focused on inter-subject communication (Venkatakumar and Schmidt, 2021). Finally, two new representations have emerged related to BPMN: the Reference Architectural Model of Industry 4.0 (RAMI 4.0), a 3D product organization modeling solution (Suri et al, 2017), and the BPMN 2.0 Based Ontology (BOO), a process modeling ontology based on BPMN 2.0 (Annane et al, 2019).…”
Section: Bpmn Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Criteria presented in the literature to compare modeling standards (Constantinescu et al, 2015;Phuong and Guidat, 2018;Venkatakumar and Schmidt, 2021); Industry 4.0 business processes…”
Section: Selecting 40 Features For Business Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Un modelo debe ser interpretado sin dificultad por todo el equipo de desarrollo, atributo que garantiza su mantenibilidad. La jerarquización de los eventos es un factor que brinda mejor entendimiento de la ejecución de los procesos al poder obtener una representación de alto nivel de una actividad concreta (Tranquillini et al, 2012;Venkatakumar and Schmidt, 2019), antes que la visualización de múltiples tareas con interacciones complejas (Kneuper, 2018;Mandal et al, 2017).…”
Section: Reducción De Complejidadunclassified