2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
231
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
11
231
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, several investigations showed that in the case of one-legged stance, only local differences (strains, stresses and displacement) were observed and that the whole mechanical response of the femur (fracture force and fracture location) was quite similar [35,48,67,76,83,91]. Verhulp et al [83] suggested that differences between the isotropic and orthotropic models can be substantially larger for non-stance loading such as lateral falls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, several investigations showed that in the case of one-legged stance, only local differences (strains, stresses and displacement) were observed and that the whole mechanical response of the femur (fracture force and fracture location) was quite similar [35,48,67,76,83,91]. Verhulp et al [83] suggested that differences between the isotropic and orthotropic models can be substantially larger for non-stance loading such as lateral falls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several FE analyses with inhomogeneous isotropic material properties have been shown to predict the strains and displacements on the surface of the proximal femur with high accuracy when compared with in vitro experiments [35,48,67,76]. The same FE models with inhomogeneous orthotropic material properties produce results similar to those obtained with isotropic material properties [3,58,83].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Researchers have used CT and/or MRI data to derive the morphology, but the segmentation of the objects in the spine from imaging data and the subsequent generation of the finite element mesh are the primary bottlenecks in the construction of subject-specific models. Several methods have been successfully employed in speeding up the segmentation of objects within the spine [31,32]; however, further advances are necessary towards making the image-to-mesh process fully automatic. Although currently, the in vitro testing of motion segments does not fully represent the in vivo conditions, many investigators have compared model simulations with laboratory experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element modelling is a powerful tool for computing mechanical stability of the femur [4,5] but requires 3D tissue distribution models. These advances may lead to validation and wider application of minimally invasive cement injection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proper pre-operative planning is therefore essential. Femoral strength and stability may be simulated using finite element (FEM) modelling [4,5] Plain radiographs such as in Fig. 1a are the default imaging modality for diagnosing osteolysis [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%