Subjective circularity performance analysis of adaptive heritage reuse practices in the Netherlands

Kaya, Deniz Ikiz; Dane, Gamze; Pintossi, Nadia; Koot, Caroline A.M.

doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102869

Cited by 29 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The findings of this study indicate that the Circular Economy Action Plan and governance facilitation are the least feasible policy-related tools. To raise awareness on this new framework and to increase the usability and feasibility of these enablers, better policy communication and educational tools are necessary [18,62,63].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Yet, the adoption of the circular economy framework into the building, renovation and reuse sector is still quite new [15][16][17]. Lack of collaboration and awareness among relevant stakeholders, such as administrators, property owners, users and developers, and limited use of knowledge, planning, administrative and financial instruments that facilitate the development and adaptation of such circularity initiatives in the built environment are some of the known challenges in this context [18]. Adaptive reuse can still be regarded as an unviable option due to financial constraints, limitations in regulatory frameworks and lack of stakeholder engagement in governance structures [19].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Lack of collaboration and awareness among relevant stakeholders, such as administrators, property owners, users and developers, and limited use of knowledge, planning, administrative and financial instruments that facilitate the development and adaptation of such circularity initiatives in the built environment are some of the known challenges in this context [18]. Adaptive reuse can still be regarded as an unviable option due to financial constraints, limitations in regulatory frameworks and lack of stakeholder engagement in governance structures [19]. Kapsalis et al (2019) also highlight some social and administrative barriers, such as "sustainable provision and modeling schemes", "socio-cultural appreciation and payment schemes", and "regulatory and maintenance schemes" that challenge the integration of the circular economy framework with ecosystem services [20].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

An Empirical Analysis of Driving Factors and Policy Enablers of Heritage Adaptive Reuse within the Circular Economy Framework

2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The adaptive reuse of cultural heritage has been recognized as a driver of the circular economy. It stimulates economic growth, boosts its inherent values, and reduces material usage and energy consumption. It can be regarded unviable due to financial constraints, limitations in regulatory frameworks and lack of engagement in decision-making. To tackle these challenges, this study aims to examine the drivers and related policy instruments that support adaptive reuse practices, and to analyze the usefulness and feasibility of a set of multi-level policy enablers at varying local contexts. In this context, we first conducted a semi-systematic review of academic and gray literature and identified 19 driving factors and associated policy documents. These instruments were concentrated on administrative, regulatory and financial tools. This analysis led to the identification of policy enablers that can be adopted at three levels: European, national and local. An online survey was then conducted to investigate how a variety of local stakeholders in the selected case cities and region evaluate the adaptability of these enablers in their individual cases. The findings show that all the assessed enablers are deemed useful and feasible to a certain extent with higher score of usefulness, confirming the adaptability of these instruments into the circular economy framework. These evidence-based results can inform future policies at multiple-levels that will accelerate and scale up circular actions through heritage adaptive reuse.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An Empirical Analysis of Driving Factors and Policy Enablers of Heritage Adaptive Reuse within the Circular Economy Framework

2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The studies under this cluster propose a combined evaluation model, established on multi-criteria analysis, with an economic model to strengthen the decision of alternative reuse of the building and the engagement of stakeholders. Amongst these include the (PESTEL-CA) framework for the allocation and classification of factors and related policy tools for adaptive reuse [67], the use of a multi-procedural approach founded on decision tests and social multi-criteria assessment in adaptive reuse [68], multi-stakeholder decision analysis (M-SDA) developed to support stakeholders in selecting appropriate use to activate circularity developments [69,70].…”

Section: Keyword Clusters and Keyword Trendsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Current Status and Emerging Trends on the Adaptive Reuse of Buildings: A Bibliometric Analysis

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The emerging demand for sustainable development and the need for efficient use of resources across the built environment have stirred research efforts globally. The construction sector is often regarded as one of the major world consumers of resources, so many international establishments are trying to create a sustainable environment through adaptive reuse of existing building stocks, a concept which has been receiving momentous recognition by reason of its richly diversified applicability for circular economy. Thus, profound knowledge of the topic and research trends is requisite to promote scholarship. For this analysis, the global research developments in adaptive reuse are assessed according to published documents, co-authorship, geographical distribution and keyword- co-occurrences. From the Scopus directory, 227 journal articles published from 2006 to 2021 were retrieved. Results showed that from 2006, published documents rose by 221 articles. About 29% of the publications were from Italy and the United Kingdom. Among the articles, 110 were from the subject area of environmental science (48.5%), while the subject area of engineering represents 104 publications (45.8%). Recent progress in adaptive reuse in building and construction includes, but not limited to: (i) component and materials reuse and technology, (ii) life cycle assessment, (iii) economic assessment and multi-criteria decision making and (iv) regulatory policies and stakeholders’ analysis. The findings are important to furnish all relevant personnel in the academic and industries with a broad perception of the status and potential emerging trends on the adaptive reuse of buildings.

show abstract

“…Circular Roadmaps, CE whitepapers, and Circular Cities Networks are now popular tools used by municipalities, governmental agencies and major urban stakeholders to build circularity, legitimize steps for closing resource loops, and for forging future‐proofing action agendas across urban activities. A formative part of this strategy involves intervening in the process of urbanization through, for example, promoting sharing/platform economies that optimize building utilization (e.g., AirBnb) (Hobson & Lynch, 2016), enabling digital infrastructure and management to encourage material flows and efficiency (e.g., design for deconstruction) (Creba & Devlieger, 2019), and supporting ‘cradle‐to‐cradle’ building renovation and widescale adaptive reuse (Foster, 2020; Foster & Saleh, 2021; Kaya et al., 2021).…”

Section: Future Proofing the City: Adaptive Reuse And The Sustainable Built Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Remaking the obsolete: Critical geographies of contemporary adaptive reuse

Lynch

2021

Geography Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Adaptive reuse, the repurposing of buildings for new uses, is an age‐old practice designed to reimagine, remake and revitalize local economies, cities and communities. In more recent decades, reuse has become part of a systematic process of contemporary city building and a globalized practice of placemaking. As such adaptive reuse is much more that a technical or practical application but is rather a complex process that engages with and transforms the social, cultural and spatial dynamics of cities and their communities around the world. This article focuses on the contemporary geographies of adaptive reuse and highlights three key themes: reuse in the post‐industrial city, reuse on the ‘edges’ and ‘peripheries’ of the global built environment, and reuse as part of the global sustainability discourse. Overall, this review highlights the rich and growing research across urban, cultural and environmental geography and exposes a number of ways in which this process operates as a powerful tool in shaping local and regional contexts.

show abstract

Subjective circularity performance analysis of adaptive heritage reuse practices in the Netherlands

Cited by 29 publications

References 32 publications

An Empirical Analysis of Driving Factors and Policy Enablers of Heritage Adaptive Reuse within the Circular Economy Framework

An Empirical Analysis of Driving Factors and Policy Enablers of Heritage Adaptive Reuse within the Circular Economy Framework

Current Status and Emerging Trends on the Adaptive Reuse of Buildings: A Bibliometric Analysis

Remaking the obsolete: Critical geographies of contemporary adaptive reuse

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About