Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media

Abstract

In the rapidly changing circumstances of our increasingly digital world, reading is also becoming an increasingly digital experience: electronic books (e-books) are now outselling print books in the United States and the United Kingdom. Nevertheless, many readers still view e-books as less readable than print books. The present study thus used combined EEG and eyetracking measures in order to test whether reading from digital media requires higher cognitive effort than reading conventional books. Young and elderly adults read short texts on three different reading devices: a paper page, an e-reader and a tablet computer and answered comprehension questions about them while their eye movements and EEG were recorded. The results of a debriefing questionnaire replicated previous findings in that participants overwhelmingly chose the paper page over the two electronic devices as their preferred reading medium. Online measures, by contrast, showed shorter mean fixation durations and lower EEG theta band voltage density – known to covary with memory encoding and retrieval – for the older adults when reading from a tablet computer in comparison to the other two devices. Young adults showed comparable fixation durations and theta activity for all three devices. Comprehension accuracy did not differ across the three media for either group. We argue that these results can be explained in terms of the better text discriminability (higher contrast) produced by the backlit display of the tablet computer. Contrast sensitivity decreases with age and degraded contrast conditions lead to longer reading times, thus supporting the conclusion that older readers may benefit particularly from the enhanced contrast of the tablet. Our findings thus indicate that people's subjective evaluation of digital reading media must be dissociated from the cognitive and neural effort expended in online information processing while reading from such devices.

iPad-Based Patient Briefing for Radiological Examinations—a Clinical Trial

“…age generally resulted in lower scores in computer skills) or even negligible (such as the fact that women had slightly lower computer skills than men). As the age or gender distribution of knowledge in computers is not a static phenomenon but is a matter of dynamic change over time, the acceptance of tablet computers by patients-even the elderly-is most likely to improve significantly in the future [9,12]. Nevertheless, measures have to be undertaken to make this interaction more intuitive which is reflected by the rather large number of questions that arose during the electronic briefing concerning the interaction with the tablet computer.…”

Print versus digital texts: understanding the experimental research and challenging the dichotomies

“…Students may be more likely to engage with and perceive as useful technologies with which they are already familiar; alternatively, they may have a strong preference for print-based texts based on prior experiences. A variety of factors are at play here: familiarity with and comfort levels of the medium or platform (Baek and Monaghan 2013;Chen et al 2014;Weisberg 2011), the cultural attitudes of learners (Kretzschmar et al 2013), the subject matter (John 2014), the length of text ( Students may declare their preference for print-based texts over e-texts, but they can also appreciate using a combination of the two (Dobler 2015;Falc 2013;Mizrachi 2015;Singer and Alexander 2016). While students overall appear to prefer printbooks, they are also satisfied with e-texts (Jeong 2012).…”

“…Students reported best test scores when using their preferred medium, suggesting that preference affects their metacognitive processes. Interestingly, a study of reading effort on three different platforms (print, tablet and e-reader) showed that all participants preferred reading a print-based text, despite it not requiring more effort to read on a screen (Kretzschmar et al 2013). The authors suggested that this may be due to participants' cultural attitudes towards screen use.…”

Empathy at the confluence of neuroscience and empirical literary studies

“…With a few exceptions (e.g., Benedetto et al, 2013), experiments are typically conducted with short texts where no page turning is needed. Alternatively, to ensure adequate experimental control, haptics is disabled by, e.g., the experimenter turning the pages on cues from the participant (Kretzschmar et al, 2013). Some interesting empirical evidence at a general level of haptics and empathy is also starting to emerge in the past year.…”