2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105045
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective poverty, deprivation, and the subjective well-being of children and young people: A multilevel growth curve analysis in Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coping style of individuals can influence SWB experiences. Therefore, a positive coping style is conducive to improving SWB experiences, whereas a negative coping style will intensify setback experiences and thereby lower SWB ( 16 ). Moreover, coping style can relieve the relationship between perfectionism and risk of suicide among the youth ( 17 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coping style of individuals can influence SWB experiences. Therefore, a positive coping style is conducive to improving SWB experiences, whereas a negative coping style will intensify setback experiences and thereby lower SWB ( 16 ). Moreover, coping style can relieve the relationship between perfectionism and risk of suicide among the youth ( 17 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such decreasing trends may be due to the high expectations ( Shoshani and Slone, 2013 ) and schoolwork pressure ( Cosma et al, 2020 ) during the middle school years in this highly formative era. The inconsistent findings with the stable pattern shown in mainland Chinese high school students ( Nie et al, 2019 ) may indicate that the developmental trajectories in life satisfaction during early adolescence and late adolescence are different (e.g., Chen, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Due to the socioeconomic disadvantage of families in relative poverty, adolescents in such families are at risk of more stresses and challenges than those living in more supportive environments; for example, family financial hardship, repeated exposure to violence, low-quality family upbringing (e.g., emotional abuse and neglect), and interpersonal difficulties (e.g., school violence; Miller et al, 2002; Uink et al, 2018). Socioeconomic disadvantages in early life are associated with poorer mental health among children and adolescents, such as reduced life satisfaction and well-being (Browman et al, 2019; K.-M. Chen, 2020), and with worse physical health outcomes (E. Chen et al, 2010; Moor et al, 2019), which are more likely to lead to higher morbidity and all-cause mortality in the long term (Turrell et al, 2007).…”
Section: Social Mobility Belief and Disadvantaged Adolescents’ Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%