Subjective Preferences of Criterion-Oriented Support of Professional Activities of Managers

Ismagilova, Fayruza; Mirolyubova, Galina

doi:10.11621/pir.2012.0022

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This Questionnaire was developed on the basis of the Model of Subjective Criteria for Monitoring Performance Efficiency, by G. Mirolyubova and F. Ismagilova (Ismagilova & Mirolyubova, 2012a, 2012b, 2013, (Ismagilova, Mirolyubova, Malysheva & Mugatabarova, 2014). The Questionnaire (Fig.…”

Section: Theoretical Analysis Of the Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Study of Russian and Slovenian Managers Using Subjective Criteria to Control Their Professional Performance

Boštjančič¹,

Ismagilova²,

Mirolyubova³

et al. 2017

CS&P

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, the first stage results of a Russian-Slovenian cross-cultural study are presented. The main purpose of the study is to describe key structural factors in the subjective criteria of performance monitoring used by Russian and Slovenian managers. The study, which comprises three steps, is of a comparative nature. In the first stage, differences between the monitoring systems of Russian and Slovenian managers are investigated. In terms of the theoretical background of the study, the Model of subjective criteria used by managers to control their performance efficiency (G. Myroliubova & F. Ismagilova) was applied. In order to collect empirical data, a Questionnaire was developed and implemented on 1 The version of this article in Russian under the title "Sub'ektivnye kriterii kontrolia sobstvennoj dejatel'nosti rossiiskih I slovenskih rukovoditelej: sravnitel'nuj analiz proffessional'noj kompetencii" [Subjective criteria of the control of the own activity of Russian and Slovenian leaders: comparative analysis of the professional competence] has appeared in the journal "Obrazovanie i nauka" [Education and science]

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Analysis Of the Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%