Subjective responses to sprint interval exercise in adults with and without Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Good, Joshua; Dogra, Shilpa

doi:10.1080/02770903.2017.1391282

Cited by 7 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A total of 31 publications involving 1,060 participants met the inclusion criteria. We contacted the authors of nineteen studies and relevant data were received directly from 17 authors (Astorino & Thum, 2016;Bartlett et al, 2011;Farias-Junior et al, 2019;Good & Dogra, 2017;Greene, Greenlee, & Petruzzello, 2018;Hoekstra, Bishop, & Leicht, 2017;Monroe et al, 2016;Niven et al, 2018;O'Neill & Dogra, 2017;Olney et al, 2018;Poon, Sheridan, Chung, & Wong, 2018;Rizk et al, 2015;Songsorn et al, 2019;Stork, Gibala, & Martin Ginis, 2018;Thum, Parsons, Whittle, & Astorino, 2017;Tsukamoto et al, 2016;Wilke et al, 2019), and we extracted data from three figures in the original papers (Foster et al, 2015;Siemens, 2013). Data reported in Decker and Ekkekakis (2017) were extracted from the published thesis (Decker, 2009), but additional data from the thesis were unavailable and these outputs are reported as one study.…”

Section: Inclusion Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Study characteristics are summarised in Table 2. Nineteen of the 33 included studies used a cross-over design comparing HIIE with MICE (Astorino & Thum, 2016;Bartlett et al, 2011;Decker & Ekkekakis, 2017;Farias-Junior et al, 2019;Gomes et al, 2018;Good & Dogra, 2017;Greene et al, 2018;Hoekstra et al, 2017;Little et al, 2014;Monroe et al, 2016;O'Neill & Dogra, 2017;Olney et al, 2018;Ong, Wallman, Fournier, Newnham, & Guelfi, 2016;Saanijoki, Tuominen, et al, 2018;Songsorn et al, 2019a, b;Stork et al, 2018;Thum et al, 2017;Tsukamoto et al, 2016).…”

Section: Descriptive Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Five studies recruited overweight to obese participants (Decker & Ekkekakis, 2017;Farias-Junior et al, 2019;Gomes et al, 2018;Martinez et al, 2015;Vella et al, 2017), five recruited physically active participants (Bartlett et al, 2011;Monroe et al, 2016;Niven et al, 2018;Olney et al, 2018;Thum et al, 2017), eight recruited inactive participants (Farias-Junior et al, 2019;Foster et al, 2015;Gomes et al, 2018;Jung et al, 2014;Little et al, 2014;Poon et al, 2018a, b;Stork et al, 2018), and three recruited predominantly or exclusively university students (Greene et al, 2018;Hoekstra et al, 2017;Kilpatrick et al, 2015), or a general population with no specified pertinent characteristics (Oliveira et al, 2013;Saanijoki, Tuominen, et al, 2018;Siemens, 2013). Two studies recruited participants with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (Good & Dogra, 2017;O'Neill & Dogra, 2017). Other pertinent participant characteristics included chronic spinal cord injury (Astorino & Thum, 2016), depressive symptoms (Namekata, 2017), pregnant participants (Ong et al, 2016), participants diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Rizk et al, 2015), insulin resistant participants , a combination of sedentary and recreationally active participants (Songsorn et al, 2019a), type II diabetics (Songsorn et al, 2019b), and participants experienced at high-intensity exercise (Tsukamoto et al, 2016).…”

Section: Descriptive Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Data from 15 studies (n=625) examined affect during and/or after HIIE and MICE (Astorino & Thum, 2016;Decker & Ekkekakis, 2017;Farias-Junior et al, 2019;Good & Dogra, 2017;Greene et al, 2018;Hoekstra et al, 2017;Jung et al, 2014;Kilpatrick et al, 2015;Niven et al, 2018;O'Neill & Dogra, 2017;Olney et al, 2018;Songsorn et al, 2019a, b;Stork et al, 2018;Thum et al, 2017). Data from the Little et al (2014) study could not be accessed, so this study was not included in the meta-analysis.…”

Section: Hiie Vs Micementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A systematic review and meta-analysis of affective responses to acute high intensity interval exercise compared with continuous moderate- and high-Intensity exercise

Niven

Laird

Saunders

et al. 2020

Health Psychology Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is evidence for the physical health benefits of high intensity interval exercise (HIIE), but its public health potential has been challenged. It is purported that compared with moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE) the high intensity nature of HIIE may lead to negative affective responses. This systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42017058203) addressed this proposition and synthesised research that compares affective responses to HIIE with MICE and vigorous intensity continuous exercise (VICE), during-, end-, and postexercise. Searches were conducted on five databases, and findings from 33 studies were meta-analysed using random effects models or narratively synthesised. A meta-analysis of affect showed a significant effect in favour of MICE vs HIIE at the lowest point, during and post-exercise, but not at end, and the narrative synthesis supported this for other affective outcomes. Differences on affect between VICE vs HIIE were limited. Pooled data showed arousal levels were consistently higher during HIIE. For enjoyment there was a significant effect in favour of HIIE vs MICE, no difference for HIIE vs VICE at post-exercise, and mixed findings for during-exercise. Although the findings are clouded by methodological issues they indicate that compared to MICE, HIIE is experienced less positively but postexercise is reported to be more enjoyable.

show abstract

Section: Inclusion Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Descriptive Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Descriptive Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Hiie Vs Micementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A systematic review and meta-analysis of affective responses to acute high intensity interval exercise compared with continuous moderate- and high-Intensity exercise

Niven

Laird

Saunders

et al. 2020

Health Psychology Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Specifically, some, but not all studies [69] have reported more modest decreases in FEV 1 in response to HIIT (90% W max for 1 minute followed by 10% of W max for 1 minute, repeated 10 times; FEV 1 -7% ± 8%) when compared with moderate intensity continuous training programs (completed at 65% W max ; FEV 1 -15% ± 12%) [40,70]. Similarly, the effects of HIIT compared with continuous training approaches on dyspnoea and rating of perceived exertion experienced during training are also disparate [71,72]. Studies which included a warm-up period, rather than commencing with work intervals by cycling 'as fast as possible' without any resistance on the pedals appeared to induce less bronchoconstriction [70].…”

Section: Asthmamentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of high intensity interval training on exercise capacity in people with chronic pulmonary conditions: a narrative review

Sawyer

Cavalheri

Hill

2020

BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Exercise training is important in the management of adults with chronic pulmonary conditions. However, achieving high intensity exercise may be challenging for this clinical population. There has been clinical interest in applying interval-based training as a strategy to optimise the load that can be tolerated during exercise training. Evidence for such an approach is limited in most chronic pulmonary populations. Main body: In this narrative review, we provide an appraisal of studies investigating whole-body high intensity interval training (HIIT) in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This is the first review to also include studies investigating HIIT in people with conditions other than COPD. Studies undertaken in adults with a chronic pulmonary condition were reviewed when participants were randomised to receive; (i) HIIT or no exercise or, (ii) HIIT or moderate intensity continuous exercise. Data were extracted on peak rate of oxygen uptake (VO 2peak ; 'cardiorespiratory fitness') and maximal work rate (W max ; 'exercise capacity'). In people with COPD, two studies demonstrated between-group differences favouring HIIT compared with no exercise. There appears to be no advantage for HIIT compared to continuous exercise on these outcomes. In people with cystic fibrosis (CF), no studies have compared HIIT to no exercise and the two studies that compared HIIT to continuous exercise reported similar benefits. In people prior to resection for non-small cell lung cancer, one study demonstrated a between-group difference in favour of HIIT compared with no exercise on VO 2peak. In people with asthma, one study demonstrated a between-group difference in favour of HIIT compared with no exercise on VO 2peak and one that compared HIIT to continuous exercise reported similar benefits. No studies were identified non-CF bronchiectasis or interstitial lung diseases. Conclusions: High intensity interval training increases cardiorespiratory fitness and exercise capacity when compared with no exercise and produces a similar magnitude of change as continuous exercise in people with COPD. There is a paucity of studies exploring the effects of HIIT in other chronic pulmonary conditions.

show abstract

Acute responses to sprint-interval and continuous exercise in adults with and without exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Good

Viana

Burgomaster

et al. 2018

Journal of Sports Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose was to compare the airway response to sprint interval exercise (SIE) and continuous exercise (CE) in active adults with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIBC), and to compare ventilatory and oxygen delivery responses between adults with and without EIBC. Adults with EIBC (n = 8, 22.3 ± 3.0 years) and adults without EIBC (n = 8, 22.3 ± 3.0 years) completed a SIE (4 × 30 s sprints separated by 4.5 min of active recovery) and CE (20 min at 65% peak power output) session. Lung function was assessed at baseline, during exercise, and up to 20 min post-exercise. Ventilatory parameters and tissue saturation index (TSI) were recorded continuously throughout the sessions. The decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s was similar following SIE (-8.6 ± 12.6%) and CE (-9.0 ± 9.3%) in adults with EIBC. There were no significant differences in any of the ventilatory parameters or in TSI during SIE or CE between those with and without EIBC. These findings suggest that SIE and CE affect airway responsiveness to a similar extent. Future research using a lower intensity CE protocol in an inactive sample of adults with EIBC is needed.

show abstract

Subjective responses to sprint interval exercise in adults with and without Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Cited by 7 publications

References 44 publications

A systematic review and meta-analysis of affective responses to acute high intensity interval exercise compared with continuous moderate- and high-Intensity exercise

A systematic review and meta-analysis of affective responses to acute high intensity interval exercise compared with continuous moderate- and high-Intensity exercise

Effects of high intensity interval training on exercise capacity in people with chronic pulmonary conditions: a narrative review

Acute responses to sprint-interval and continuous exercise in adults with and without exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About