1998
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.98.11020462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective scoring of cough in children: parent-completed vs child-completed diary cards vs an objective method

Abstract: Cough is often used as an outcome measure, although the reporting of cough is unreliable. Using a 24 h ambulatory cough meter to measure cough frequency, the aim of this study was to compare: 1) the correlation of child-completed diary cards to the objective measurement, with that of parent-completed diary cards; and 2) the visual analogue scale (VAS) to the verbal category descriptive (VCD) score. The cough meter consisted of a previously validated Holter monitor and a cough processor. Eighty four children (3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
183
2
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
183
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…9,18 That noted, subjective reporting of cough by children and their parents has been shown to be imprecise. [33][34][35][36][37][38] These studies, however, were performed on children with chronic cough, asthma, or cystic fibrosis as opposed to the acute cough that was evaluated in this study. In addition, in this investigation, each parent served as his or her own control, because their answers were compared with their own responses from the previous night.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,18 That noted, subjective reporting of cough by children and their parents has been shown to be imprecise. [33][34][35][36][37][38] These studies, however, were performed on children with chronic cough, asthma, or cystic fibrosis as opposed to the acute cough that was evaluated in this study. In addition, in this investigation, each parent served as his or her own control, because their answers were compared with their own responses from the previous night.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed protocol, investigations used, and number of abnormal results have been published elsewhere. 14 A validated cough diary 15 was completed by each patient (or caregiver) throughout the duration of the study to assess response to treatment. Diagnostic categories were reached using standard a priori definitions which included investigation results and response to treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnostic categories were reached using standard a priori definitions which included investigation results and response to treatment. Response to treatment was defined as improvement by .75% according to cough diary data 15 or total resolution of the cough. The primary diagnostic outcome was defined as the diagnosis (and subsequent treatment) which resulted in cough resolution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical history was obtained from a parent on a standardised proforma for all children. Parent(s) also scored their child's cough on a validated cough visual analogue scale of 1 (no cough) to 10 (most severe cough) [24]. Exclusion criteria of children were as follows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%